The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition
Abstract
Listening comprehension is viewed theoretically as an active process in which individuals focus on selected aspects of aural input, construct meaning from passages, and relate what they hear to existing knowledge. This theoretical view has not been sufficiently supported by direct research which clarifies what listeners actually do while engaged in listening tasks. This study focused on the mental processes second language learners use in listening comprehension, the strategies they use in different phases of comprehension, and the differences in strategy use between students designated by their teachers as effective and ineffective listeners. The students in this study were all from Hispanic backgrounds, intermediate in English proficiency, and were enrolled in ESL classes at the secondary level. Data were collected using think-aloud procedures in which students were interrupted during a listening comprehension activity and asked to indicate what they were thinking. Findings indicated that mental processes students use in listening comprehension paralleled three thoeretically-derived phases of the comprehension process: perceptual processing, parsing, and utilization. Each phase was characterized by active processing and by the use of learning strategies. Three predominant strategies which differentiated effective from ineffective listeners were selfmonitoring, elaboration, and inferencing. The findings were related to implications for instructional practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategies for Language Learning and for Language Use: Revising the Theoretical Framework
MACARO, E. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x · Cited by 488
The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language (French) Listeners: A Descriptive Study
Vandergrift, L. (1997) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x · Cited by 391
Strategy Instruction in Listening for Lower‐Intermediate Learners of French
Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x · Cited by 368
Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns
Goh, C. C. M. (2002) · System · doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00004-0 · Cited by 358
Can Strategy Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension?
Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- O'MALLEY, J. M., CHAMOT, A. U., & KUPPER, L.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 418-437
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2161196841
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/10.4.418
- The paper
- O'MALLEY, J. M., CHAMOT, A. U., & KUPPER, L. (1989). Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.4.418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.