The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language (French) Listeners: A Descriptive Study
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper reports on a study of the relationship between the types of listening comprehension strategies reported, the frequency of their use, and the differences in reported use across four variables: level of language proficiency, gender, listening ability, and learning style. High school students of French reported on their thought processes during a think‐aloud procedure. All students reported using metacognitive and cognitive strategies, with an overall increase in total number of strategies reported by proficiency level. Results indicate clear differences in reported strategy use by listening ability and proficiency level. The use of metacognitive strategies, such as comprehension monitoring, problem identification, and selective attention appeared to be the significant factor distinguishing the successful from the less successful listener. Differences for gender were minimal, and differences for learning style were inconclusive. A qualitative analysis of representative protocols also pointed to the integral role of metacognitive strategies as well as differences in the use of prior knowledge, inferencing, prediction skills, and monitoring. Results are discussed in the light of information‐processing theory. Implications for pedagogy conclude the paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know
Horwitz, E. K., & Oxford, R. (1991) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329849 · Cited by 5,941
The psychology of sex differences
(1975) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(75)80031-1 · Cited by 5,488
Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524490 · Cited by 2,771
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1990) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,528
Individual Differences in Second Language Learning
Skehan, P. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315831664 · Cited by 1,518
The Psychology of Sex Differences: —Vol. II: Annotated Bibliography
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503620797 · Cited by 1,290
Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.3.430 · Cited by 670
Individual Differences in Second Language Learning
Skehan, P. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009979 · Cited by 610
Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition
O'MALLEY, J. M., CHAMOT, A. U., & KUPPER, L. (1989) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/10.4.418 · Cited by 572
Cited by
LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION: CURRENT ISSUES AND RESEARCH
Chamot, A. U. (2005) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190505000061 · Cited by 722
The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x · Cited by 603
Self-citationTeaching L2 Learners How to Listen Does Make a Difference: An Empirical Study
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x · Cited by 477
Self-citationWang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013 · Cited by 170
Foreign Language Anxiety and Strategy Use: A Study with Chinese Undergraduate EFL Learners
Lu, Z., & Liu, M. (2011) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.4304/jltr.2.6.1298-1305 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandergrift, L.
- Venue
- Foreign Language Annals
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387-409
- ISSN
- 0015-718X (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9720
- OpenAlex
- W2130519701
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 33.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language (French) Listeners: A Descriptive Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
- The paper
- Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language (French) Listeners: A Descriptive Study. Foreign Language Annals. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.