The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intonational Meaning in English Discourse: A Study of Non-Native Speakers
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a study on the intonation of second language speakers of English from three language groups: Spanish, Japanese, and Thai. The investigation focused on how non-native speakers use intonation to signal meaning in the structure of their discourse. Thirty adult speakers of English as a second language at the intermediate level and ten native speaker controls were tape recorded in both oral reading and free speech tasks. The speech data were analyzed on a Visipitch machine to measure how pitch and intensity were used contrastively to show relationships in discourse. Following a model of intonational meaning developed by Pierrehumbert and Hirschberg (1990), pitch accents, phrase accents, boundary tones, and paratones (Yule 1980) were measured. The study revealed that while the native speakers made significant use of pitch contrasts to signal meaning on the items measured, the non-native speakers did not consistently use pitch to signal meaningful contrasts in many of the same environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ACCENT, INTELLIGIBILITY, AND COMPREHENSIBILITY: Evidence from Four L1s
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001010 · Cited by 892
KANG, O., RUBIN, D., & PICKERING, L. (2010) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x · Cited by 347
Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness
Kang, O. (2010) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 · Cited by 327
Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech
Moyer, A. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794407 · Cited by 304
Beyond Segments: Towards a L2 Intonation Learning Theory
Mennen, I. (2015) · Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- WENNERSTROM, A.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-420
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W1981925051
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intonational Meaning in English Discourse: A Study of Non-Native Speakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/15.4.399
- The paper
- WENNERSTROM, A. (1994). Intonational Meaning in English Discourse: A Study of Non-Native Speakers. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.4.399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.