Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited
Abstract
John Swales's 1986 article ‘Citation analysis and discourse analysis’ was written by a discourse analyst to introduce citation research from other fields, mainly sociology of science, to his own discipline. Here, I introduce applied linguists and discourse analysts to citation studies from information science, a complementary tradition not emphasized by Swales. Using replicable biblio‐metric techniques, I show that interdisciplinary ties have grown among citation researchers from discourse analysis, sociology of science, and information science in the years since Swales wrote. Key authors, journals, articles, and books are presented in tables based on cocitation data from the Institute for Scientific Information. While theoretical integration of the different strands of research is far from complete, this article carries the effort forward by reviewing contributions from the 1970s to the present in three major lines of research: citation classification, content analysis of citation contexts, and studies of citer motivations. I pay particular attention to ideas that bear on teaching the art of citing—for example, in courses in English for research purposes—and to controversies in citation research of interest to discourse analysts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citations do not always equate endorsement.
“Citations do not always equate endorsement, therefore it is important to understand the context of a citation.”
From Evaluating the Accuracy of scite, a Smart Citation Index (2023) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines
Harwood, N. (2009) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames
Jurgens, D., Kumar, S., Hoover, R., McFarland, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00028 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publications
Cohan, A., Ammar, W., van Zuylen, M., & Cady, F. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1361 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
“There is a large body of work studying the intent of citations and devising categorization systems (Stevens and Giuliano, 1965; Moravcsik and Mu-rugesan, 1975; Garzone and Mercer, 2000; White, 2004; Ahmed et al., 2004; Teufel et al., 2006; Agarwal et al., 2010; Dong and Sch¨afer, 2011).”
BackgroundZhang, G., Ding, Y., & Milojević, S. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22850 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities
White, H. D. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000027313.91401.9b · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationThe linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: An approach using n-grams
Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Sugimoto, C. R., & Lariviere, V. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2134-8 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of semantic classification of citations
Kunnath, S. N., Herrmannova, D., Pride, D., & Knoth, P. (2021) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00159 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Karakus, M., Usak, M., & Ersozlu, A. (2021) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020988865 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Evaluating the Accuracy of scite, a Smart Citation Index
Bakker, C., Theis-Mahon, N., & Brown, S. J. (2023) · Hypothesis: Research Journal for Health Information Professionals · doi:10.18060/26528 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- White, H. D.
- Corresponding author
- White, H. D.
- ORCID
- White, H. D.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-116
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2043650643
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- citation analysis, discourse analysis, sociology of science, information science, interdisciplinary research, co-citation analysis, citation classification, citation context, citing, bibliometric analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review