Cited by 50scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

The linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: An approach using n-grams

Open access
Bertin, Marc, Atanassova, Iana, Sugimoto, Cassidy R., Lariviere, Vincent·2016·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-016-2134-8

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agreement is expressed mostly at the end of research papers, especially in the 'Discussion' section and towards the end of the 'Results' section. Disagreement is less common in scientific discourse.

    “Their results show that 'agreement is expressed mostly at the end of a research papers, especially in the 'Discussion' section and towards the end of the 'Results' section. Disagreement is less common in scientific discourse' (p. 1426).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Garfield, E. (1964). Can citation indexing be automated? In Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, symposium proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 189–192). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards, Miscellaneous Publication 269.
  2. Garfield, E., et al. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from http://www.elshami.com/Terms/I/impactfactor-Garfield.pdf.
  3. Jörg, B. (2008). Towards the nature of citations. In Poster proceedings of the 5th international conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS 2008).
  4. Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105(5), 470–486.
  5. Nakov, P. I., Schwartz, A. S., & Hearst, M. A. (2004). Citances: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text. Paper presented at the SIGIR 2004 workshop on search and discovery in bioinformatics, Sheffield.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Sugimoto, C. R., & Lariviere, V.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Bourgogne (FR)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bertin, Marc
  • Atanassova, Iana
  • Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2016-09-30
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
1417-1434
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2524791359
Cited by
50
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
citation functions, citation context, rhetorical structure, IMRAD structure, scientific writing, PLOS journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review