The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Each section in the narrative adopts argumentative moves designed to convince the reader of the work's claims (Swales, 1986;Swales, 1990).”
From Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames (2018) · cites this paper as Swales, 1986
Citations
Cites
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting?
Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277500500403 · Cited by 357
A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields
Peritz, B. C. (1983) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02147226 · Cited by 105
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shaffer, J. A., DeGeest, D., & Li, A. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115598239 · Cited by 393
Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames
Jurgens, D., Kumar, S., Hoover, R., McFarland, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00028 · Cited by 212
Zhang, G., Ding, Y., & Milojević, S. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22850 · Cited by 169
Dong, Y. R. (1996) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199615303 · Cited by 113
The linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: An approach using n-grams
Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Sugimoto, C. R., & Lariviere, V. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2134-8 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- SWALES, J.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-56
- ISSN
- 0142-6001
- 1477-450X
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review