Cited by 105scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsAcademic Writing and Publishing

A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields

Peritz, Bluma C.·1983·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02147226

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peritz (1983) found only 3.7% of perfunctory mentions among citations to 106 articles in five journals in different fields.

    “The only exception to these high proportions of perfunctory citations comes from a study by Peritz (1983) who found only 3.7% of perfunctory mentions among the citations to 106 articles published in fi ve journals in different fi elds.”

    From Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals (2015) · cites this paper as Peritz (1983)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peritz, B. C.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Peritz, Bluma C.
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
1983-09
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
303-312
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2161564750
Cited by
105
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
citation classification, citation analysis, social sciences, demography, librarianship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review