The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English
Abstract
Seeing language as a complex, dynamic system and language use/acquisition as dynamic adaptedness (‘a make-do’ solution) to a specific context proves a useful way of understanding change in progress, such as that which occurs with a developing L2 system. This emergentist shift of perspective provides another way of understanding previously observed characteristics of learner language, that is that its development is not discrete and stage-like but more like the waxing and waning of patterns; that, from a target-language perspective, certain aspects of the behavior are progressive, others, regressive; that change can be gradual and it can be sudden; and that the latter notably heralds the emergence of a new order qualitatively different and novel from earlier organizations. In addition, when group data are disaggregated, it is clear that there are many paths to development. By closely examining the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English, the emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy can be seen, not as the unfolding of some prearranged plan, but rather as the system adapting to a changing context, in which the language resources of each individual are uniquely transformed through use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed differences between oral and written L2 data are a relatively novel finding, as few microdevelopment studies look into mode effects.
“The observed differences between the oral and written L2 data are a relatively novel finding, as there are only very few microdevelopment studies looking into the effects of mode”
From The Dynamic Multicausality of Age of First Bilingual Language Exposure: Evidence From a Longitudinal Content and Language Integrated Learning Study With Dense Time Serial Measurements (2020) · cites this paper as Larsen-Freeman, 2006
Cites
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230 · see citing works
Dynamic assessment in the language classroom
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168805lr166oa · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for academic purposes programme.
Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Yu, H., & Lowie, W. (2020) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amz040 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
PFENNINGER, S. E. (2020) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12666 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Shen, C., Shi, P., Guo, J., Xu, S., & Tian, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258286 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Linguistic complexity in second language acquisition
Kuiken, F. (2023) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2021-0112 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Wang, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974481 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…and variations of learners’ language production from a multi-dimensional perspective by analyzing different variables that support or compete with each other to discover the factors that influence L2 development (e.g., Larsen-Freeman, 2006; Verspoor et al., 2008, 2012; Vyatkina et al., 2015).”
Background
- Authors
- Larsen-Freeman, D.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 590-619
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W1991667866
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 107.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- second language acquisition, Chinese learners of English, learner language development, oral expression, written expression, complexity, fluency, accuracy, dynamic adaptation, individual differences in language development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review