Cited by 82EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningPhonetics and Phonology Research

Dynamic Paths of Complexity and Accuracy in Second Language Speech: A Longitudinal Case Study of Chinese Learners

Open access
Yu, Hanjing, Lowie, Wander·2020·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

The present study investigated the developmental patterns of Chinese EFL(AQ) learners’ oral language in terms of complexity and accuracy and looked into the dynamic interactions between them within the framework of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). The data were analysed using dynamic analyses (moving min–max graphs, moving correlations and Monte Carlo Simulations). It was found that, firstly, at the group level, the general developmental trends of both complexity and accuracy showed improvements. Secondly, at the individual level, the developmental patterns were non-linear and dynamic with high degrees of variability, and individual language development was influenced by the initial states. Thirdly, the analyses revealed a complex interplay between complexity and accuracy, which gradually shifted from a clearly competitive relationship during the early stages to a supportive relationship in later stages. This shift in interaction shows that complexity goes hand in hand with accuracy, which corroborates the interconnectedness of subsystems as one of the major characteristics of CDST. The findings confirm the applicability of CDST approaches to L2 oral development and carry valuable implications for CDST theory development and oral language teaching.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/amz040

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cai, J. 2007. The Effects of Multiple Linguistic Factors on the Simple past Use in English Interlanguage. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  2. Ellis, R. and G. Barkhuizen. 2005. Analyzing Learner Language. Oxford University Press.
  3. Van Geert, P. 1995. 'Growth dynamics in devel- opment,' in R. F. Port and T. van Gelder (eds): Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. The MIT Press, pp. 313-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, H., & Lowie, W.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Yu, Hanjing
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2019-07-23
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
855-877
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2962831481
Cited by
82
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
24.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
second language speech, Chinese learners of English, oral language development, complex dynamic systems theory, developmental trajectories, initial state, oral language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review