The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA
Abstract
This paper is principally about methodology. It first summarizes five issues in the emerging research agenda of conversation analysis-for-second language acquisition (CA-for-SLA), and develops empirically based analyses of classroom talk that occurs over several days and months to illustrate how a longitudinal learning behavior tracking (LBT) methodology for CA-for-SLA works. LBT has two components: Learning object tracking (LOT) and learning process tracking (LPT). LOT involves tracking when participants deploy potential learning objects within a single conversation and in subsequent speech events. LPT involves carrying out conversation analyses of participants’ emerging grammar to understand how they orient to learning objects as resources for doing language learning behaviors that occur both in the moment and over time. The paper concludes with an overview of the methodological strengths and weaknesses of LBT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
Higgs, T. V., & Krashen, S. D. (1983) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328293 · Cited by 5,339
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150
Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning
Bernhardt, E. B., & Krashen, S. D. (1989) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326882 · Cited by 4,614
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,037
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629 · cited 1×
“Finally, He Hua recycles this input as ‘comprehensible output’ (Swain 1985, 1995) when he produces the uptake (Lyster 1998; Lyster and Ranta 1997; Panova and Lyster 2002) of the word ‘ prerequi[sites ’ in line 122 and provides the independent gloss ‘ previous courses ’ in line 124.”
Background(2006) · Cited by 2,315
Cited by
Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816683559 · Cited by 323
Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: the development of L2 grammar-for-interaction
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 · Cited by 157
An A–Z of Applied Linguistics Research Methods
Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3 · Cited by 156
Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game
MARSH, A. P., & TAINIO, L. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00853.x · Cited by 152
Shintani, N. (2015) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.166 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Markee, N.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-427
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2154798212
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 67.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/amm052
- The paper
- Markee, N. (2007). Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
