Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translanguaging Identities and Ideologies: Creating Transnational Space Through Flexible Multilingual Practices Amongst Chinese University Students in the UK

Li, W., Zhu, H.·2013·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

There are thousands of ethnic Chinese students from different backgrounds in British universities today, a fact that has not been fully appreciated or studied from an applied linguistics perspective. For example, there are third- or fourth-generation British-born Chinese; there are students from China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore who have received whole or part of their primary and secondary education in Britain; and there are Chinese students who completed their schooling in their home countries. To add to the diversity of the Chinese student population, several distinctive varieties of Chinese are spoken as well as different varieties of English and other languages. In terms of their choice of language and social networks, the Chinese students have several options, including, for example, staying with their own language variety group (e.g. Cantonese, Mandarin); staying with their own region-of-origin group (e.g. British-born, Mainland Chinese, Taiwanese, Hong Kong); and creating new transnational and multilingual groupings. This article focuses on a group of Chinese university students who have chosen to create transnational and multilingual networks. Through analysis of narrative data and ethnographic observations, we explore issues such as their socio-cultural identification processes, the interactions between their linguistic and political ideologies; their multilingual practices and what they have learned from being part of this new social space.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/amt022

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 2011, THE MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 95, 356, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01206.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2010, MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 94, 103, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2004, CULTURE AND ORGANIZATION, 10, 329, 10.1080/1475955042000313768 · DOI
  4. 2007, LINGUISTICS AND EDUCATION, 8, 325
  5. 2005, LANGUAGE COMMUNICATION, 25, 257, 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 1979, SOPHIA LINGUISTICA, 12, 3
  7. 2001, GLOBAL NETWORKS, 1, 195, 10.1111/1471-0374.00013 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2012, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION, 18, 655, 10.1080/13803611.2012.718490 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2005, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 37, 375, 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.008 · DOI
  10. 2011, JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 43, 1222, 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2011, THE MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 95, 370, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01209.x · DOI
  12. 2010, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE, 205, 155
  13. 2010, LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 24, 41
  14. 2007, LINGUISTICS AND EDUCATION, 18, 258, 10.1016/j.linged.2007.07.007 · DOI
  15. 1998, MIND CULTURE AND ACTIVITY, 5, 157, 10.1207/s15327884mca0503_2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Li, W., & Zhu, H.
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2013-10-03
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
516-535
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2076904996
Cited by
369
References
4
FWCI
57.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.