Cited by 799Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceLogic and Philosophy of Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description

Russell, Bertrand·1911·Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Bertrand Russell; V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 11, Issue 1, 1 June 1911, Page

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 796

On the supposed connection between proper names and singular thought
Goodman, R. S. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1202-1 · Cited by 8
Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style: Reference and Beyond
Scott, K. (2019) · Research Repository (Kingston University London) · Cited by 8
The Meta-Dynamic Nature of Consciousness
Barnden, J. A. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22121433 · Cited by 7
Knowledge of things and aesthetic testimony
Ranalli, C. (2023) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2023.2177339 · Cited by 7
“Knowledge of things as ‘ knowledge by acquaintance ’ has been defended by Russell (1911, 1912).”
The Vagaries of References
Michaelson, E. (2023) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.3115 · Cited by 8
Bertrand Russell's Logic
Irvine, A. D. (2009) · Handbook of the history of logic · doi:10.1016/s1874-5857(09)70005-6 · Cited by 8
VII-Rigidity and General Terms
Martí, G. (2004) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00085.x · Cited by 8
Mental Files and Identity
Récanati, F. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_27 · Cited by 8
On the nature of expert teacher knowledge
Píšová, M., & Janík, T. (2018) · ORBIS SCHOLAE · doi:10.14712/23363177.2018.103 · Cited by 8
“…and Aristotle and their conceptions of epistémé vs. phronésis (Korthagen, 2001, p. 22), knowledge by description vs. knowledge by acquaintance (Russell, 1911), know ing that vs. knowing how (Ryle, 1949), declarative knowledge vs. procedural knowledge (Anderson, 1983), formal knowledge vs.…”
Background
Marginal Notes on Amethodical Requirements Engineering: What Experts Learned from Experience
Sim, S. E., Alspaugh, T. A., & Al-Ani, B. (2008) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2008.52 · Cited by 8
“Similarly, Russell [19] characterized the distinction as “knowledge by acquaintance” versus “knowledge by description.”
Background
The Epistemology and Science of Justified Reason
Dreyer, V. M. (2021) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-021-00399-3 · Cited by 7
Pain cannot (just) be whatever the person says: A critique of a dogma
Djordjevic, C. (2023) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.12446 · Cited by 7
Naturalism and the hard problem of mysticism in psychedelic science
Jylkkä, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1112103 · Cited by 7
“18 Thus, it is different from what Russell called knowledge by acquaintance, which he defines as the most direct relation a subject can have to an object (Russell, 1910, p. 108).”
Background
Paleontology as a circumstantial evidence lawsuit
Ebbighausen, R., & Korn, D. (2013) · Historical Biology · doi:10.1080/08912963.2012.688199 · Cited by 7
Philosophical Reflections on the “Fish Happiness” Anecdote
THOMPSON, K. O. (2016) · Philosophy East and West · doi:10.1353/pew.2016.0093 · Cited by 7
Expression – An Experimental Field for Investigation and Management of the Paradox of Education (With Illustrations from Voice Education)
Nohavová, A., & Slavík, J. (2012) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v5n6p24 · Cited by 7
Is Truth Ineffable?
Hintikka, J. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8601-6_2 · Cited by 7
The Intentionality of Thinking: The Difference Between State of Affairs and Propositional Matter
Künne, W. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3521-1_8 · Cited by 7
The Role of Attention in Russell's Theory of Knowledge
Amijee, F. (2013) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2013.846250 · Cited by 7
The development of Wittgenstein's views about the other minds problem
ter Hark, M. R. M. (1991) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/bf00485401 · Cited by 7
Constitutive knowledge sources: an institutional approach to epistemic trust in opaque AI systems
Gazit, L. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00930-2 · Cited by 12
Making sense of feelings
Key, B., & Brown, D. J. (2024) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niae034 · Cited by 6
Russell on Acquaintance with Spatial Properties: The Significance of James
Klein, A. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-40808-2_8 · Cited by 6
Post-perceptual confidence and supervaluative matching profile
Cheng, T. (2018) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2018.1562370 · Cited by 6
“For more on the relevant issues, see Shea (2018) and Ramsey (2007).”
Background
Understanding Religious Experience: From Conviction to Life's Meaning
Moser, P. K. (2019) · Cited by 6
Are Proper Names Rigid Designators?
Baumann, P. (2010) · Axiomathes · doi:10.1007/s10516-010-9100-5 · Cited by 6
“‘‘Names are always rigid designators,’’ Kripke states (p. 58), but other expressions are not, notably most definite descriptions (noun phrases of the syntactic form ‘‘the F’’), expressions that had been taken by earlier philosophers, in particular Frege (1892/1997), Russell (1910, 1919) , Wittgenstein (1953, Sect.”
Background
Justifying educational acquaintance with the moral horrors of history on psycho-social grounds: ‘Facing History and Ourselves’ in critical perspective
Maxwell, B. (2008) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449640802018693 · Cited by 6
“These distinctions are discussed in Britzman (1998) and Russell (1911).”
Background
Introspective knowledge of experience and its role in consciousness studies
Butler, J. (2011) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 6
Manifest validity and beyond: an inquiry into the nature of coordination and the identity of guises and propositional-attitude states
Bonardi, P. (2019) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-018-9245-z · Cited by 6
“The Spirit Thickened”: Making the Case for Dance in the Medical Humanities
Shevzov-Zebrun, N., Barchi, E. I., & Grogan, K. (2020) · Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10912-020-09646-2 · Cited by 6
Avicenna on empty intentionality: a case study in analytical Avicennianism
Zarepour, M. S. (2022) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2022.2115006 · Cited by 6
Critical Realism in Perspective: Remarks on a Neglected Current in Neo-Kantian Epistemology
Neuber, M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_46 · Cited by 6
Singular Reference Without Singular Thought
Martone, F. (2016) · Manuscrito · doi:10.1590/0100-6045.2016.v39n1.fm · Cited by 6
On the “Gray's Elegy” Argument and its Bearing on Frege's Theory of Sense
Levine, J. (2004) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00395.x · Cited by 6
‘Sense Certainty’, or Why Russell had no ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance’
Westphal, K. R. (2002) · Hegel Bulletin · doi:10.1017/s026352320000793x · Cited by 6
And so on: two theories of regress arguments in philosophy
Wieland, J. W. (2013) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 6
Reference: Philosophical Theories
Sullivan, A. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/01138-x · Cited by 6
The normativity of introspective acquaintance knowledge
Pallagrosi, J. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-04998-5 · Cited by 5
I Feel Your Pain: Acquaintance and the Limits of Empathy
Atiq, E. H., & Duncan, M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198924159.003.0008 · Cited by 6
Predicting waste management behaviors using an extended theory of reasoned action model
Valentin, A. P. M., Bonifacio, P. B. S. D., Castro, S. I. C. O., et al. (2024) · Cleaner Waste Systems · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100193 · Cited by 5
Declarations of Dependence: On the Constitution of the Anthropocene
Enroth, H. (2020) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276420978283 · Cited by 5
Theoretical Framework of the Need Knowledge-Driven Organization
Kragulj, F. (2022) · Knowledge management and organizational learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12729-8_3 · Cited by 6
A Critical Examination of Sellars’s Theory of Perception
Gupta, A. K. (2012) · The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2582-9_3 · Cited by 5
Analysis and Interpretation in the Exact Sciences
Frappier, M., Brown, D., & DiSalle, R. (2012) · The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2582-9 · Cited by 12
Perceptual Intimacy and Conceptual Inadequacy: A Husserlian Critique of McDowell’s Internalism
Kjosavik, F. (2003) · Contributions to phenomenology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1011-5_3 · Cited by 5
In defense of the unification argument for predicativism
Tayebi, S. (2018) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-018-9233-3 · Cited by 5
Common nouns as modally non-rigid restricted variables
Lasersohn, P. (2020) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-019-09293-4 · Cited by 5
Against epistemic absolutism
Lai, C. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02964-x · Cited by 5
(ANTI-)DESCRIPTIVISM, MENTAL FILES, AND THE COMMUNICATION OF SINGULAR THOUGHTS
Récanati, F. (2009) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 5
AMBIGUOUS ARTICLES AN ESSAY ON THE THEORY OF DESCRIPTIONS
Pupa, F. (2008) · Cited by 5
Keeping Track of Invisible Individuals While Exploring a Spatial Layout with Partial Cues: Location-based and Deictic Direction-based Strategies
Bullot, N. J., & Jacques Droulez, A. (2008) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080701840861 · Cited by 5
Russell and His Sources for Non-Classical Logics
Anellis, I. H. (2009) · Logica Universalis · doi:10.1007/s11787-009-0006-1 · Cited by 5
Proper Names: Philosophical Aspects
Reimer, M. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/01137-8 · Cited by 5
Ontologia e metafisica
Varzi, A. C. (2002) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 5
ON THE SEMANTICS OF PROPOSITIONAL ATTITUDE REPORTS
Dahllöf, M. (1995) · Cited by 5
Indexicals and Names in Proverbs
Kijania-Placek, K. (2016) · Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric · doi:10.1515/slgr-2016-0033 · Cited by 5
“Descriptive theories of proper names (Frege 1892, Russell 1911, Strawson 1959, Searle 1958, Jackson 1998, Chalmers 2004, Poller 2014) postulate descriptive condition as a semantic value, but since this condition must be an identifying condition, the resulting meaning concerns just an individual…”
Background
Russell on Introspection and Self-Knowledge
Wishon, D. (2018) · doi:10.5040/9781474278089.0019 · Cited by 5
The protection of traditional knowledge in the Ecuadorian Amazon
Moeller, N. I. (2010) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · doi:10.17635/lancaster/thesis/770 · Cited by 5
How can we better account for experiential knowledge in co-production frameworks?
Johner, Z., Klenk, N. L., Cvitanovic, C., et al. (2025) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104183 · Cited by 5
Knowledge by acquaintance & impartial virtue
Atiq, E. H. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02289-w · Cited by 4
“Although Russell (1911) is often credited with introducing the concept of knowledge by acquaintance to analytic philosophy, the general idea—that there is a way of knowing things that does not necessarily involve being in a truth-evaluable mental state—has recurred throughout the history of…”
What is knowledge by acquaintance?
Kriegel, U. (2025) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12550 · Cited by 4
Neurobiological emergentism: sentience as an emergent process and the experiential gap
Feinberg, T. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528982 · Cited by 6
Family lexicon: Using language models to encode memories of personally familiar and famous people and places in the brain
Bruera, A., & Poesio, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291099 · Cited by 4
Meinongianism
Reicher, M. E. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009181068 · Cited by 5
Reference in memories from perceptual and non-perceptual experiences: a non-disjunctivist account including vicarious, oneiric and fictional remembering
Werning, M., & Liefke, K. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-04936-5 · Cited by 4
“The descriptivist theory of singular reference was first developed for singular terms such as proper names in language (Frege, 1986; Russell, 1905, 1911).”
Languages for the Analytic Tradition
Pérez, D. I. (2018) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2018.1429738 · Cited by 4
“Of course one could argue that all I have said is futile, because ‘knowledge by acquaintance’ is a technical expression, introduced by Russell (1911), in order to explain the special kind of relationship that we have with sense data and platonic universals; ‘knowledge by acquaintance’ is a direct…”
Background
Dreams, Remembering, and Remembering Dreams: An Intentionalist, Direct Realist, Acquaintance Account
Copenhaver, R. (2024) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68204-9_2 · Cited by 4
Speaking of Being: Language, Speech, and Silence in Being and Time
Absher, B. (2016) · The Journal of Speculative Philosophy · doi:10.5325/jspecphil.30.2.0204 · Cited by 4
An ontological investigation over human relations in linked data
Vacura, M., Svátek, V., & Gangemi, A. (2016) · Applied Ontology · doi:10.3233/ao-160169 · Cited by 4
“Russell (1911) distinguishes knowing by acquaintance and by description.”
Background
Introspection
Besedin, A. P., Volkov, D. B., Kuznetsov, A. V., et al. (2021) · Epistemology & Philosophy of Science · doi:10.5840/eps202158236 · Cited by 4
Dretske’s Naturalistic Representationalism and Privileged Accessibility Thesis
Sahu, M. K. (2022) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-022-00578-w · Cited by 4
Description: Its meaning, epistemology, and use with emphasis on information science
Hjørland, B. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24834 · Cited by 4
Curiosity and Ignorance
İnan, İ. (2016) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · Cited by 4
On Pictorially mediated mind-object relations*
Pepp, J. (2019) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2018.1562372 · Cited by 4
First-Person Perspective in Experience: Perspectival De Se Representation as an Explanation of the Delimitation Problem
Sebastián, M. Á. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00564-4 · Cited by 4
Incompleteness and fictionality in Meinong's object theory
Haller, R. (1989) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/bf00138680 · Cited by 4
Russell on the semantics and pragmatics of indexicals
Roberts, L. D. (1984) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/bf02378963 · Cited by 4
Wittgenstein on being and time
Hintikka, J. (1996) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1996.tb00528.x · Cited by 4
Russell's Separation of the Logical and Semantic Paradoxes
Landini, G. (2004) · Revue internationale de philosophie · doi:10.3917/rip.229.0257 · Cited by 4
Rigid Designation and Semantic Structure
Sullivan, A. (2007) · Cited by 4
Loana dans le métro. Remarques sur l'indexicalité mentale.
Récanati, F. (2001) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 4
Meinong’s Multifarious Being and Russell’s Ontological Variable: Being in Two Object Theories across Traditions at the Turn of the 20th Century
Day, I. (2018) · Open Philosophy · doi:10.1515/opphil-2018-0023 · Cited by 4
Phenomenal Concepts and the Problem of Acquaintance
Livingston, P. M. (2013) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 4
The Varieties of Psychedelic Epistemology
Letheby, C. (2019) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · Cited by 6
From folk psychology to cognitive ontology
Dewhurst, J. E. (2017) · ERA · Cited by 4
Reference without intentions in large language models
Pepp, J. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2448482 · Cited by 7
Experiential Knowledge in Mental Health Care: A Coherent Concept?
Dings, R., & Strijbos, D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0014 · Cited by 4
Seeing Expectations as “Opportunities”: Interpretive Philosophy and the Origins of “Opportunity” Perceptions
Packard, M. D., & Madjdi, F. (2025) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587251392499 · Cited by 4
Lambda abstraction as a factor in human uniqueness
Bayırlı, İ. K. (2023) · Biolinguistics · doi:10.5964/bioling.11205 · Cited by 2
“We know the author of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight not by having any direct experience involving this person but only by a description of this person, what Russell (1911) called knowledge by description.”
Background
Mnemic scenarios as pictures
Liefke, K. (2025) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-025-00288-6 · Cited by 4
L'idealismo di Oxbridge tra Lotze e Meinong. A proposito delle origini della filosofia analitica
Dappiano, L. (1994) · Axiomathes · doi:10.1007/bf02228233 · Cited by 3
For the Disunity of Semantics
Martí, G. (2014) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12061 · Cited by 3
The paradoxes and Russell’s theory of incomplete symbols
Klement, K. C. (2013) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0165-z · Cited by 3
The Place of Vagueness in Russell’s Philosophical Development
Levine, J. (2016) · The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24214-9_7 · Cited by 3
Attention, Information, and Epistemic Perception
Bullot, N. J. (2011) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7944.003.0017 · Cited by 4
Towards a theory of singular thought about abstract mathematical objects
Davies, J. E. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1644-0 · Cited by 3
“…permit acquaintance with ordinary concrete objects.16 Here is the contemporary ‘standard’ acquaintance constraint on singular thought: 15 Cf. Russell (1911): “We have acquaintance with sense-data, with many universals, and possibly with ourselves, but not with physical objects or other…”
Background
Social identity, group speech, and negotiated meaning
Bentley, A. (2020) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2020.01.008 · Cited by 3
Varieties of Logical Form
Sainsbury, M. (2020) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2020-0011 · Cited by 3
Rational belief and Dialetheism
Bonardi, P. (2021) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip-2021-2016 · Cited by 3
The metaphysical burden of Millianism
Mahant, N. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03754-3 · Cited by 3

Authors: Russell, B.
Corresponding author: Russell, Bertrand
Venue: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published: 1911-06-01
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 108-128
ISSN: 0066-7374 (ISSN-L)
1467-9264
DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108
OpenAlex: W2505960753
Cited by: 799
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 74 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 51
FWCI: 0.00
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Keywords: knowledge by acquaintance, knowledge by description, epistemology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks