The DOI matches its Crossref record.
V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description
Abstract
Bertrand Russell; V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 11, Issue 1, 1 June 1911, Page
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 796
Confucius the untouchable: on the semiotics of historization
Yu, H. (2022) · Chinese Semiotic Studies · doi:10.1515/css-2022-2072 · Cited by 3
Perceptual Modes of Presentation as Object Files
Siegel, G. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00633-8 · Cited by 3
“For example, Russell (1911, 1912) didn’t allow de re thoughts about perceptual objects due to his restrictive views on acquaintance (a necessary condition for such thoughts).”
Werner, K. (2023) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-023-00732-0 · Cited by 4
The Transcendental Metaphysic of G. F. Stout: His Defence and Elaboration of Trope Theory
MacBride, F. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_10 · Cited by 3
The Importance of Fictional Properties
Sawyer, S. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.003.0009 · Cited by 3
Singular thoughts andde reattitude reports
Openshaw, J. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12180 · Cited by 3
A NEW INTERPRETIVIST METASEMANTICS FOR FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL DISAGREEMENTS
Schroeter, F., Schroeter, L., & Toh, K. (2020) · Legal Theory · doi:10.1017/s1352325220000063 · Cited by 3
“We include in the matching model both traditional descriptivist theories like those advocated by Frege (1892) and Russell (1911), and sophisticated neo-Fregean theories of concepts and meanings that can be found in, e.g., Lewis (1970), Peacocke (1992), Jackson (1998), and Chalmers (2006).”
MethodDummett's Forward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism
Dejnožka, J. (2013) · Jagiellonian University, Institute of Philosophy, Diametros Journal · doi:10.13153/diam.25.2010.408 · Cited by 3
Self-Knowledge and Externalism
Brewer, B. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-2783-3_1 · Cited by 3
Neisser, J. U. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9256-5 · Cited by 4
Knowledge, Consciousness, Terminology, and Therapy
Overskeid, G. (1994) · Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506079409455957 · Cited by 3
Justification and Praxeological foundationalism1
Haller, R. (1988) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00201748808602159 · Cited by 3
A comprehensive philosophical approach to Qohelet’s epistemology
Gericke, J. (2015) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v71i1.2868 · Cited by 3
Living in One World: Searle’s Social Ontology and Semiotics
Msimang, P. M. (2014) · Signs and Society · doi:10.1086/676121 · Cited by 3
Striking a Line through the Great American Desert
MENARD, A. (2010) · Journal of American Studies · doi:10.1017/s0021875810000034 · Cited by 3
Hanna, R. (2008) · doi:10.4324/9780203879368.ch4 · Cited by 3
Westphal, K. R. (2015) · Hegel Bulletin · doi:10.1017/hgl.2015.16 · Cited by 3
“Russell (1911) famously claimed we can have empirical knowledge either by aconceptual acquaintance with, or alternatively by description of, particulars.”
BackgroundRussellians can have a no proposition view of empty names
Hodgson, T. (2017) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2017.1372307 · Cited by 3
“…basis of an objection to Russellianism because it effectively rejects the possibility of empty names; it does so in a way that is reminiscent of Russell’s own solution to the problem i.e. by denying that a name can enter the language without a form of acquaintance with a referent (Russell 1911).”
BackgroundAn Analytic-Hermeneutic History of Consciousness
Hellie, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.008 · Cited by 3
Naive Russellians and Schiffer’s Puzzle
Rinner, S. (2020) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00218-3 · Cited by 3
Semantic Borders and Incomplete Understanding
Silva-Filho, W. J., & Dazzani, M. V. M. (2015) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9315-5 · Cited by 3
Katzner, D. W. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-585-26879-8_5 · Cited by 3
Galery, T. (2012) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 3
Levin, M. E. (2007) · Criminal Justice Ethics · doi:10.1080/0731129x.2007.9992209 · Cited by 3
Russell's Theory of Meaning and Descriptions (1905-1920)
Martinich, A. P. (1976) · Journal of the history of philosophy · doi:10.1353/hph.2008.0614 · Cited by 3
On Some Split Binding Paradigms
Authier, J.-M. P., & Reed, L. A. (1997) · Natural Language & Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1023/a:1005893409885 · Cited by 3
Neuroidealism, perceptual acquaintance and the Kantian roots of predictive processing
Britten-Neish, G. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04778-7 · Cited by 3
The Development of Gilbert Ryle’s Conception of Knowledge
Kremer, M. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Tsompanidis, V. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9247-6 · Cited by 2
“Singular thoughts have been discussed by (Russell 1910; Kaplan 1979; Evans 1982; Burge 1977), and, more recently, (Bach 1994; Jeshion 2010).”
BackgroundReferring to the Qualitative Dimension of Consciousness: Iconicity instead of Indexicality
Champagne, M. (2013) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217313000899 · Cited by 2
Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs: A New Précis
Champagne, M., & Semiotic Society of America (2019) · The American Journal of Semiotics · doi:10.5840/ajs2019353/458 · Cited by 2
von Heusinger, K. (2015) · Cited by 2
Epistemic Actions, Abilities and Knowing-How: A Non-Reductive Account
Miller, S. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2020931 · Cited by 2
Almog was Right, Kripke’s Causal Theory is Trivial
Smit, J. P. (2023) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-023-00625-0 · Cited by 2
Naïve realism and sensorimotor theory
Kim, D. S. H. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04757-y · Cited by 2
The multiple meanings of knowledge in scholarship at the science-policy interface
Klenk, N. L. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103948 · Cited by 2
Acquaintance with Color: Prolegomena to a Study of Goethe’s Zur Farbenlehre
Lande, J. B. (2016) · Goethe yearbook · doi:10.1353/gyr.2016.0012 · Cited by 2
Récanati, F. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4042-3_14 · Cited by 2
Boyle, N., & Disley, L. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139626675 · Cited by 2
The “Beautiful” in Information
Benoît, G. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04417-5_34 · Cited by 2
“Philosophy of Aesthetics and Information Visualization 339 or a question of naming [3][4][5][ 6 ].”
BackgroundRussellian Propositions and Properties
Almäng, J. (2011) · Metaphysica · doi:10.1007/s12133-011-0089-z · Cited by 2
Borgmann, A. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.998109 · Cited by 3
Hauser, K. (2014) · Axiomathes · doi:10.1007/s10516-014-9234-y · Cited by 2
Spohn, W. (1997) · KOPS (University of Konstanz) · Cited by 2
The Intentional Versus the Propositional Structure of Contents
Spohn, W. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5474-7_16 · Cited by 2
“tions (cf. Russell 1910 /11 and 1918/19), and Carnapian intensions (cf.”
BackgroundRussell and Leibniz on the Classification of Propositions
Griffin, N. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0504-5_6 · Cited by 2
On Knowing How I Feel About That—A Process-Reliabilist Approach
Herzberg, L. A. (2016) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-016-0282-3 · Cited by 2
Tractatus Objects and the Logic of Color Incompatibility
Jacquette, D. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56919-2_4 · Cited by 2
Meditations on Meinong’s Golden Mountain
Jacquette, D. (2015) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18075-5_6 · Cited by 2
Westphal, K. R. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137309228_12 · Cited by 2
Zoological Nomenclature and Speech Act Theory
Cambefort, Y. (2015) · Archimedes · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16444-1_4 · Cited by 2
Mell, R. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-13610-9_17 · Cited by 2
Propositional Ontology and Logical Atomism
Rodríguez-Consuegra, F. A. (2004) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110199680.417 · Cited by 2
Are Sensory Concepts Learned by “Abstraction” from Experience?
Sundström, P. (2018) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-018-0002-z · Cited by 2
Russellians can solve the problem of empty names with nonsingular propositions
Hodgson, T. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01971-3 · Cited by 2
“Bertrand Russell wanted this result (Russell 1911; Jeshion 2014).”
BackgroundSmit, J. P. (2019) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-019-00104-7 · Cited by 2
A representationalist reading of Kantian intuitions
Shahmoradi, A. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02198-6 · Cited by 2
“46 Russell (1910).”
Potter, N. N., & El‐Mallakh, R. S. (2019) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2019.0026 · Cited by 2
How Does a Theoretical Term Refer?
Hashemi, A. (2021) · Axiomathes · doi:10.1007/s10516-021-09555-6 · Cited by 2
“According to the descriptivist theory of reference, mainly developed by Frege (1982), Russell (1911), and Searle (1958), to refer to an entity, the speaker, in her mind, has to associate some particular descriptive content with a name or a term in question.”
MethodAre there de jure objections to Mādhvic belief?
Gupta, A. (2021) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412521000251 · Cited by 2
Bertrand Russell’s epistemology: towards neutral monism
Дидикин, А. Б. (2022) · Omsk Scientific Bulletin Series Society History Modernity · doi:10.25206/2542-0488-2022-7-1-84-90 · Cited by 2
Grounding and the Epistemic Regress Problem
Siscoe, R. W. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00561-7 · Cited by 2
Philosophy of Engineering and Design (Technological) Actions
Лактіонова, А. (2023) · Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought) · doi:10.15407/fd2023.01.148 · Cited by 2
Conceptualizing Consciousness: a Change in Perspective
Aparicio, M. K., & Lazaridis, C. (2023) · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.021 · Cited by 2
Direct reference and the Goldbach puzzle
Rinner, S. (2023) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.12504 · Cited by 2
“I” Who? A New Look at Peirce’s Theory of Indexical Self-Reference
Stango, M. (2015) · The Pluralist · doi:10.5406/pluralist.10.2.0220 · Cited by 2
La théorie des descriptions : passé et présent
Neale, S. (1990) · Hermès · doi:10.4267/2042/15325 · Cited by 2
Baldwin, T. (2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470998656.ch3 · Cited by 2
Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Immediate Experience
Hintikka, J. (1990) · J.F. Bergmann-Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-30086-2_14 · Cited by 2
Referência E Denotação: Duas Funções Semânticas Irredutíveis
Graça, A. S. (2002) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2002-0001 · Cited by 2
A framework for philosophical biologyPreprint
Ehsani, S. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.00033 · Cited by 3
“3 and “knowledge by description” [30].”
Richard, M. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781118972090.ch14 · Cited by 2
Crane on Putnam on Intentionality
Rinner, S. (2024) · Australasian Philosophical Review · doi:10.1080/24740500.2024.2485491 · Cited by 2
Empathy, Thick and ThinPreprint
Crockett, M. J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5862422 · Cited by 3
Die Frage nach dem wirklichen Julius Cäsar – und warum sie immer noch aktuell ist
Cardani, M., & Tamborini, M. (2019) · Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie · doi:10.1515/dzph-2019-0031 · Cited by 1
Acquaintance, Attention, and Introspective Justification
Taylor, S. A. (2023) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-023-00576-x · Cited by 1
Horniczak, K., Porębski, A., & Skoczeń, I. (2024) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-023-10055-6 · Cited by 1
Eagle, M. N. (2023) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/00030651241238325 · Cited by 1
Psychedelics: Recent Philosophical Discussions
Letheby, C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_101-1 · Cited by 1
Russell on Experience and Egocentricity
Wishon, D. (2024) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akae002 · Cited by 1
The cross‐linguistic uses of proper names
Mahant, N. (2024) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.12578 · Cited by 1
“…contrast, consider a rather fringe (metalinguistic) view concerning names — one arguably held by Bertrand Russell at some places in his oeuvre (e.g., Russell, 1911, p. 119, 1918, p. 524) — according to which a name, say “ Julius Caesar ” , is an abbreviated (or truncated) description whose full…”
On Knowing I Am Not Alone in the Universe
Eilan, N. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0017 · Cited by 1
Campbell, L. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Preston, D. (2025) · Art Design & Communication in Higher Education · doi:10.1386/adch_00115_1 · Cited by 1
Knowledge-specific epistemic injustice
Reibold, K. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2025.2590055 · Cited by 1
Practitioner’s Response to Manifesto 7
Rolls, L. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009309042.016 · Cited by 1
A Criterion of Literality for Names
Mahant, N. (2025) · Crítica (México D F En línea) · doi:10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1754 · Cited by 1
“Descriptivists include Frege (1892/1997) and Russell (1911) 3 others.”
Duncan, M. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197844151.001.0001 · Cited by 2
A New Acquaintance Theory of Introspection
Duncan, M. (2026) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70097 · Cited by 2
“However, most contemporary acquaintance theorists draw their inspiration from Russell ( 1911 , 1912 ).”
InfluentialThe Sensory Dimension of Episodic Recollection
Mitchell, J. (2026) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-026-01071-6 · Cited by 1
Adjectives without syntactic categories
Elbourne, P. (2026) · Natural Language & Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1007/s11049-026-09703-w · Cited by 1
Teaching women into the history of early analytic philosophy
Connell, S. M., & Janssen‐Lauret, F. (2026) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2026.2637703 · Cited by 1
Kammerer, F. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197840283.001.0001 · Cited by 3
Philo of Larissa and Platonism
Glidden, D. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2942-0_16 · Cited by 1
First-person privilege, judgment, and avowal
Samoilova, K. (2015) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2015.1032332 · Cited by 1
Whom Is the Problem of the Essential Indexical a Problem for?
Stojanovic, I. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44607-9_23 · Cited by 1
“7 [ 9 ], p. 23. Whom Is the Problem of the Essential Indexical a Problem for? 309”
BackgroundDescriptions: Frege and Russell Combined
Chateaubriand, O. (2002) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/a:1014439314029 · Cited by 1
Persson, J. (2008) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 1
The Knowledge Argument and the Implications of Phenomenal Knowledge
Howell, R. J. (2011) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00408.x · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, B.
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Bertrand
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1911-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-128
- ISSN
- 0066-7374 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9264
- OpenAlex
- W2505960753
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Keywords
- knowledge by acquaintance, knowledge by description, epistemology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review