Cited by 5Skin Protection and AgingDermatologic Treatments and ResearchDermatology and Skin Diseases

Prospective, randomized, comparative study of the cutaneous effects of a topical body treatment compared to a bland moisturizer

Open access
Carruthers, Jean, Bourne, Gyasi, Bell, Michaela, Widgerow, Alan·2021·Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over time human skin thins and loses elasticity; topical treatments attempt to reverse this process. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of TransFORM Body Treatment (TFB) in skin rejuvenation compared to a bland moisturizer on the extensor and volar forearms. METHODS: Blinded participants were given 2 products to apply on the designated forearms with follow-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Measurements included skin thickness, photography, dermatopathology, cutaneous elasticity determined by 2 different methods, and patient-reported outcomes. All were compared to baseline. RESULTS: Changes between bland moisturizer and TFB were recorded for the following parameters. (1) Roughness: extensor -0.09 mm for bland moisturizer and -0.26 mm for TFB (P = 0.174); volar 0.01 mm for bland moisturizer and -0.23 mm for TFB (P = 0.004). (2) Recoil velocity: volar -56°/sec for bland moisturizer and -24°/sec for TFB (P = 0.61); extensor -95°/sec for bland moisturizer and -63°/sec for TFB (P = 0.57). Retraction speed: volar -3.25 ms for bland moisturizer and -20.08 ms for TFB (P = 0.33); extensor -2.17 ms for bland moisturizer and -10.83 ms for TFB (P = 0.66). Histologically, TFB resulted in an increase in mucopolysaccharide content, new collagen, and number of elastin fibers in the papillary dermis. Changes in the Rao-Goldman score were also observed: volar -0.17 for bland moisturizer and -0.33 for TFB (P = 0.25); extensor -0.08 for bland moisturizer and -0.17 for TFB (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Histology showed production of new collagen and elastin. Quantification of changes in skin thickness, skin retraction speed, and skin recoil velocity showed trends that agree with the visual data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/asj/sjab161

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common protocols or approaches among Gen Z seeking to maintain a youthful appearance include noninvasive cosmetic procedures (dermal fillers, laser skin rejuvenation, microdermabrasion, chemical peels), skincare routines, healthy lifestyle choices, and social media beauty trends (viral skincare routines, face masks, innovative beauty gadgets).

    “Some common protocols or approaches include noninvasive cosmetic procedures, such as dermal fillers, laser skin rejuvenation, microdermabrasion, chemical peels, skincare routines to maintain a youthful glow, healthy lifestyle choices, and social media beauty trends, including viral skincare routines, face masks, and innovative beauty gadgets.6‐8”

    From Prejuvenation: The Global New Anti-Aging Trend (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion’s “Prejuvenation” section supports preventive skincare: it discusses sunscreen and topical treatments to maintain youthful skin. The paper does not address Gen Z’s commonly used approaches, the listed cosmetic procedures, healthy lifestyle choices beyond sun protection, or social-media beauty trends. Our copy provides section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Prejuvenation: The Global New Anti-Aging Trend

    Haykal, D., Nahai, F., & Cartier, H. (2023) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum · doi:10.1093/asjof/ojad061 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

    “skincare routines to maintain a youthful glow, healthy lifestyle choices, and social media beauty trends, including viral skincare routines, face masks, and innovative beauty gadgets.(6-8) While prejuvenation offers numerous benefits, it is crucial to clarify to patients that it can slow down the aging process but not…”
    Background

Authors
Carruthers, J., Bourne, G., Bell, M., & Widgerow, A.
Affiliations
  • Carruthers Instruments Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Alastin Skincare, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Carruthers, Jean
Venue
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Published
2021-04-02
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
NP1188-NP1198
ISSN
  • 1090-820X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-330X
OpenAlex
W3147410779
Cited by
5
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aesthetic Surgery Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alastin Skin Care Inc.
  • Carruthers Instruments Inc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
skin rejuvenation, emollients, skin thickness, skin elasticity, skin roughness, collagen, elastin, glycosaminoglycans, papillary dermis, forearm skin, skin aging
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Humans, Prospective Studies, Skin, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review