The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Fixed-radius Point Count Method for Nonbreeding and Breeding Season Use
Open accessAbstract
We provide a detailed description of a fixed-radius point count method that carries fewer assumptions than most of the currently popular methods of estimating bird density and that can be used during both the nonbreeding and breeding seasons. The method results in three indices of bird abundance, any of which can be used to test for differences in community composition among sites, or for differences in the abundance of a given bird species among sites. These indices are (1) the mean number of detections within 25 m of the observer, (2) the frequency of detections within 25 m of the observer, and (3) the frequency of detections regardless of distance from the observer. The overall ranking of species abundances from a site is similar among the three indices, but discrepancies occur with either rare species that are highly detectable at great distances or common species that are repulsed by, or inconspicuous when near, the observer. We argue that differences in the behavior among species will preclude an accurate ranking of species by abundance through use of this or any other counting method in current use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of frequency count data using the negative binomial distribution
White, G. C., & Bennetts, R. E. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265753 · Cited by 465
Kasten, E. P., Gage, S. H., Fox, J., & Joo, W. (2012) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.08.001 · Cited by 408
CHANGES IN BIRD ABUNDANCE AFTER WILDFIRE: IMPORTANCE OF FIRE SEVERITY AND TIME SINCE FIRE
Smucker, K. M., Hutto, R. L., & Steele, B. M. (2005) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/04-1353 · Cited by 332
Self-citationSongbird response to increased willow (Salix spp.) growth in Yellowstone's northern range
Baril, L. M., Hansen, A. J., Renkin, R., & Lawrence, R. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/10-0169.1 · Cited by 40
Grassland bird diversity and abundance in the presence of native and non-native grazers
Boyce, A. J., Shamon, H., Kunkel, K. E., & McShea, W. J. (2021) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-01944-160213 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutto, R. L., Pletschet, S. M., & Hendricks, P.
- Venue
- The Auk
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 593-602
- ISSN
- 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4254
- OpenAlex
- W787784284
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Fixed-radius Point Count Method for Nonbreeding and Breeding Season Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/auk/103.3.593
- The paper
- Hutto, R. L., Pletschet, S. M., & Hendricks, P. (1986). A Fixed-radius Point Count Method for Nonbreeding and Breeding Season Use. The Auk. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/103.3.593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.