Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds
Abstract
Predator and prey attack-escape performance is Likely to be the outcome of an evolutionary arms race, Predatory birds are typically larger than their prey suggesting different flight performances. We analyze three idealized attack-escape situations between predatory and prey birds: climbing flight escape, horizontal speeding, and turning and escape by diving. Generally a smaller bird will outclimb a larger predator and hence outclimbing should be a common escape strategy. However, some predators such as the Eleonora's falcon (Falco eleonorae) has a very high rate of climb for its size. Prey species with an equal or higher capacity to climb fast, such as the swift Apus apus, usually adopt climbing escape when attacked by Eleonora's falcons. To analyze the outcome of the turning gambit between predator and prey we use a Howland diagram, where the relative linear top speeds and minimum turning radii of prey and predator define the escape and danger zones. Applied to die Eleonora's falcon and some potential prey species, this analysis indicates that the falcon usually wins against the example prey species; that is, the prey will be captured. Level maneuvering hunting is the most common strategy seen in Eleonora's falcons. To avoid capture via use of this strategy by a predator, the prey should be able to initiate tight turns at high linear speed, which is facilitated by a low wing loading (weight per unit of wing area). High diving speed is favored by large size. Lf close enough to safe cover, a prey might still opt for a vertical dive to escape in spite of lower terminal diving speed than that of the predator. On the basis of aerodynamic considerations we discuss escape flight strategies in birds in relation to morphological adaptations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The jinking escape pattern has never been studied in birds; previous research has focused on escape by climbing, diving or turning smoothly.
“Yet this jinking escape pattern has never been studied in birds, and previous research has instead focused on studying escape by climbing, diving or turning smoothly (Hedenström and Rosén 2001).”
From Sexual size dimorphism, prey morphology and catch success in relation to flight mechanics in the peregrine falcon: a simulation study (2019) · cites this paper as Hedenström and Rosén 2001
Cites
Predation risk and the cost of being fat
Gosler, A. G., Greenwood, J. J. D., & Perrins, C. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377621a0 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Gliding Flight: Speed and Acceleration of Ideal Falcons During Diving and Pull Out
Tucker, V. A. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.201.3.403 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Diving or stooping is a typical attack strategy by large falcons, famous by the performance of the peregrine (Falco peregrinus) (Alerstam, 1987; Peter and Kestenholz, 1998; Tucker, 1998).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A new approach to determining pterosaur body mass and its implications for pterosaur flight
Witton, M. P. (2008) · Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.12010 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Mills, R., Hildenbrandt, H., Taylor, G. K., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“produce a higher load factor), then it may escape by turning more tightly than its attacker in a smooth maneuver called a turning gambit [21, 22].”
BackgroundMills, R., Taylor, G. K., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2019) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.01979 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hedenstrom, A.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-156
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2136228680
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Keywords
- predator-prey interactions, aerial hunting, Eleonora's falcon, Falco eleonorae, common swift, climbing flight, turning performance, wing loading, flight morphology, evolutionary arms race
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review