Cited by 95Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies

Gliding Flight: Speed and Acceleration of Ideal Falcons During Diving and Pull Out

Tucker, Vance A.·1998·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Some falcons, such as peregrines (Falco peregrinus), attack their prey in the air at the end of high-speed dives and are thought to be the fastest of animals. Estimates of their top speed in a dive range up to 157 m s−1, although speeds this high have never been accurately measured. This study investigates the aerodynamic and gravitational forces on ‘ideal falcons’ and uses a mathematical model to calculate speed and acceleration during diving. Ideal falcons have body masses of 0.5–2.0 kg and morphological and aerodynamic properties based on those measured for real falcons. The top speeds reached during a dive depend on the mass of the bird and the angle and duration of the dive. Given enough time, ideal falcons can reach top speeds of 89–112 m s−1 in a vertical dive, the higher speed for the heaviest bird, when the parasite drag coefficient has a value of 0.18. This value was measured for low-speed flight, and it could plausibly decline to 0.07 at high speeds. Top speeds then would be 138–174 m s−1. An ideal falcon diving at angles between 15 and 90 ° with a mass of 1 kg reaches 95 % of top speed after travelling approximately 1200 m. The time and altitude loss to reach 95 % of top speed range from 38 s and 322 m at 15 ° to 16 s and 1140 m at 90 °, respectively. During pull out at top speed from a vertical dive, the 1 kg ideal falcon can generate a lift force 18 times its own weight by reducing its wing span, compared with a lift force of 1.7 times its weight at full wing span. The falcon loses 60 m of altitude while pulling out of the dive, and lift and loss of altitude both decrease as the angle of the dive decreases. The 1 kg falcon can slow down in a dive by increasing its parasite drag and the angle of attack of its wings. Both lift and drag increase with angle of attack, but the falcon can cancel the increased lift by holding its wings in a cupped position so that part of the lift is directed laterally. The increased drag of wings producing maximum lift is great enough to decelerate the falcon at −1.5 times the acceleration of gravity at a dive angle of 45 ° and a speed of 41 m s−1 (0.5 times top speed). Real falcons can control their speeds in a dive by changing their drag and by choosing the length of the dive. They would encounter both advantages and disadvantages by diving at the top speeds of ideal falcons, and whether they achieve those speeds remains to be investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.201.3.403

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Brown, 1976, British Birds of Prey
  2. Cade, 1982, The Falcons of the World
  3. Clark, 1995, How fast is the fastest bird?, WildBird, 9, 42
  4. Crystal, 1997, Cambridge Factfinder
  5. Dement’ev, 1951, Order Falconiformes (Accipitres). Diurnal raptors, 71
  6. Hantge, 1968, Zum Beuteerwerb unserer Wanderfalken (Falco peregrinus), Orn. Mitt, 20, 211
  7. Lawson, 1930, The stoop of a hawk, 79
  8. Mebs, 1975, Falcons and their relatives, 411
  9. Orton, 1975, The speed of a peregrine’s dive, 588
  10. Prandtl, 1957, Applied Hydro- and Aero-mechanics
  11. Savage, 1992, Peregrine Falcons

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tucker, V. A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Tucker, Vance A.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
201
Issue
3
Pages
403-414
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2135347777
Cited by
95
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
Keywords
falcons, Falco peregrinus, gliding flight, aerodynamic forces, parasite drag, lift force, angle of attack, wing span, deceleration, prey capture, bird flight mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review