The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time and energy constraints and the relationships between currencies in foraging theory
Open accessAbstract
Measured foraging strategies often cluster around values that maximize the ratio of energy gained over energy spent while foraging (efficiency), rather than values that would maximize the long-term net rate of energy gain (rate). The reasons for this are not understood. This paper focuses on time and energy constraints while foraging to illustrate the relationship between efficiency and rate-maximizing strategies and develops models that provide a simple framework to analyze foraging strategies in two distinct foraging contexts. We assume that while capturing and ingesting food for their own use (which we term feeding), foragers behave so as to maximize the total net daily energetic gain. When gathering food for others or for storage (which we term provisioning), we assume that foragers behave so as to maximize the total daily delivery, subject to meeting their own energetic requirements. In feeding contexts, the behavior maximizing total net daily gain also maximizes efficiency when daily intake is limited by the assimilation capacity. In contrast, when time available to forage sets the limit to gross intake, the behavior maximizing total net daily gain also maximizes rate. In provisioning contexts, when daily delivery is constrained by the energy needed to power self-feeding, maximizing efficiency ensures the highest total daily delivery. When time needed to recoup energetic expenditure limits total delivery, a low self-feeding rate relative to the rate of energy expenditure favors efficient strategies. However, as the rate of self-feeding increases, foraging behavior deviates from efficiency maximization in the direction predicted by rate maximization. Experimental manipulations of the rate of self-feeding in provisioning contexts could be a powerful tool to explore the relationship between rate and efficiency-maximizing behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates
Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. J. (1997) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr19970009 · Cited by 454
Fast and fuel efficient? Optimal use of wind by flying albatrosses
Weimerskirch, H., Guionnet, T., Martin, J., Shaffer, S. A., & Costa, D. P. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1223 · Cited by 443
Hedenström, A., & Alerstam, T. (1995) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0082 · Cited by 261
The energetics of uniquely human subsistence strategies
Kraft, T. S., Venkataraman, V. V., Wallace, I. J., Crittenden, A. N., Holowka, N. B., Stieglitz, J., Harris, J., Raichlen, D. A., Wood, B., Gurven, M., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf0130 · Cited by 88
Great ranging associated with greater reproductive investment in mammals.
Pontzer, H., & Kamilar, J. M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806105106 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Ydenberg, R. C., Welham, C. V. J., Schmid-Hempel, R., Schmid-Hempel, P., & Beauchamp, G.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-34
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2051790173
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time and energy constraints and the relationships between currencies in foraging theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/5.1.28
- The paper
- Ydenberg, R. C., Welham, C. V. J., Schmid-Hempel, R., Schmid-Hempel, P., & Beauchamp, G. (1994). Time and energy constraints and the relationships between currencies in foraging theory. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/5.1.28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.