The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales
Abstract
Most analyses of the relationship between group size and food intake of social carnivores have shown a discrepancy between the group size that maximizes energy intake and that which is most frequently observed. Around southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, killer whales of the so-called transient form forage in small groups, and appear to prey exclusively on marine mammals. Between 1986 and 1993, in approximately 434 h of observations on transient killer whales, we observed 138 attacks on five species of marine mammals. Harbor seals were most frequently attacked (130 occasions), and the observed average energy intake rate was more than sufficient for the whale's energetic needs. Energy intake varied with group size, with groups of three having the highest energy intake rate per individual. While groups of three were most frequently encountered, the group size experienced by an average individual in the population (i.e., typical group size) is larger than three. However, comparisons between observed and expected group sizes should utilize only groups engaged in the behavior of interest. The typical size of groups consisting only of adult and subadult whales that were engaged primarily in foraging activities confirms that these individuals are found in groups that are consistent with the maximization of energy intake hypothesis. Larger groups may form for (1) the occasional hunting of prey other than harbor seals, for which the optimal foraging group size is probably larger than three; and (2) the protection of calves and other social functions. Key words: dispersal, foraging, group hunting, harbor seals, killer whales, optimal group size, social structure. [Behav Ecol 7: 408-416 (1996)]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough
Packer, C., Scheel, D., & Pusey, A. E. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285079 · Cited by 651
Cited by
Ford, J. K., Ellis, G. M., Barrett-Lennard, L. G., Morton, A. B., Palm, R. S., & Balcomb III, K. C. (1998) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z98-089 · Cited by 507
The Social Structure and Strategies of Delphinids: Predictions Based on an Ecological Framework
Gowans, S., Würsig, B., & Karczmarski, L. (2007) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(07)53003-8 · Cited by 272
Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
Vucetich, J. A., Peterson, R. O., & Waite, T. A. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018 · Cited by 176
Chiyo, P. I., Wilson, J. W., Archie, E. A., Lee, P. C., Moss, C. J., & Alberts, S. C. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru152 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Baird, R. W., & Dill, L. M.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 408-416
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2160712395
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/7.4.408
- The paper
- Baird, R. W., & Dill, L. M. (1996). Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/7.4.408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.