The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits
Open accessAbstract
Individual differences in personality affect behavior in novel or challenging situations. Personality traits may be subject to selection because they affect the ability to dominate others. We investigated whether dominance rank at feeding tables in winter correlated with a heritable personality trait (as measured by exploratory behavior in a novel environment) in a natural population of great tits, Parus major. We provided clumped resources at feeding tables and calculated linear dominance hierarchies on the basis of observations between dyads of color-ringed individuals, and we used an experimental procedure to measure individual exploratory behavior of these birds. We show that fast-exploring territorial males had higher dominance ranks than did slow-exploring territorial males in two out of three samples, and that dominance related negatively to the distance between the site of observation and the territory. In contrast, fast-exploring nonterritorial juveniles had lower dominance ranks than did slow-exploring nonterritorial juveniles, implying that the relation between dominance and personality is context-dependent in the wild. We discuss how these patterns in dominance can explain earlier reported effects of avian personality on natal dispersal and fitness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 · Cited by 2,999 · cited 1×
“Behavioral responses to different stimuli are further often correlated (Huntingford, 1976; Koolhaas et al., 1999; van Oers et al., 2004a) and are therefore commonly regarded as individual differences in temperament or personality (Gosling, 2001; Gosling and John, 1999).”
BackgroundFear and Fearfulness in Animals
Boissy, A. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418981 · Cited by 747
Cited by
Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities
Cockrem, J. F. (2007) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0175-8 · Cited by 478
KORSTEN, P., MUELLER, J. C., HERMANNSTÄDTER, C., BOUWMAN, K. M., DINGEMANSE, N. J., DRENT, P. J., LIEDVOGEL, M., MATTHYSEN, E., Van OERS, K., Van OVERVELD, T., et al. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04518.x · Cited by 123
Self-citationWilliamson, C. M., Franks, B., & Curley, J. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00152 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Dingemanse, N. J., & de Goede, P.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1023-1030
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2163205119
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
