Copulation duration in the soldier fly: the roles of cryptic male choice and sperm competition risk
Abstract
In most animal species, females invest more in reproduction than males do and are therefore expected to be the choosier sex. However, male choice is also expected to occur whenever there is sufficient variation in female quality and male mating effort is high. Postcopulatory or “cryptic” male choice is defined as variation in the amount of resources males allocate to females of varying quality. The soldier fly Merosargus cingulatus exhibits significant variation in copulation duration. This variation in mating effort may be a consequence of cryptic male choice, although other processes such as sperm competition may also play a role. In this study, I manipulated factors associated with the risk of sperm competition (male density) and varying mate quality (female size) to determine whether these factors affected male mating effort. I found direct evidence that male M. cingulatus can control copulation duration. Copulations were longer when male density was high, which support the hypothesis that males increase copulation duration when there is a high risk of sperm competition. In addition, copulation duration was longer when males mated with larger more fecund females, which supports the hypothesis of cryptic male choice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More distantly related soldier flies do not lek: Merosargus cingulatus mate near their oviposition site of decomposing vegetation and Inopus rubiceps engages in scramble competition.
“However, more distantly related soldier flies do not lek: Merosargus cingulatus , which mate near their oviposition site of decomposing vegetation (Barbosa 2011), and Inopus rubiceps (Macquart) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) which engages in scramble competition (Alcock 1990).”
From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Barbosa 2011
Retention duration, sperm viability and selective sperm use suggest potential for cryptic female choice in BSF, as described in other stratiomyids.
“Retention duration, sperm viability and selective sperm use suggest potential for cryptic female choice as described in other stratiomyids (Barbosa 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015).”
From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Barbosa 2011
Cites
The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies
VAHED, K. (1998) · Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0006323197005112 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Males responding to sperm competition cues have higher fertilization success in a soldier fly
Barbosa, F. (2012) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/ars035 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationManas, F., Labrousse, C., & Bressac, C. (2025) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2025.104751 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lemke, N. B., & Puniamoorthy, N. (2026) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.70249 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Retention duration, sperm viability and selective sperm use suggest potential for cryptic female choice as described in other stratiomyids (Barbosa 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015).”
- Authors
- Barbosa, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barbosa, Flavia
- ORCID
- Barbosa, Flavia
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1332-1336
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2130142140
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- copulation duration, sperm competition, Stratiomyidae, male density, female body size, female fecundity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review