The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic strategies for the single nucleotide polymorphism haplotype assembly problem
Open accessAbstract
With the consensus human genome sequenced and many other sequencing projects at varying stages of completion, greater attention is being paid to the genetic differences among individuals and the abilities of those differences to predict phenotypes. A significant obstacle to such work is the difficulty and expense of determining haplotypes--sets of variants genetically linked because of their proximity on the genome--for large numbers of individuals for use in association studies. This paper presents some algorithmic considerations in a new approach for haplotype determination: inferring haplotypes from localised polymorphism data gathered from short genome 'fragments.' Formalised models of the biological system under consideration are examined, given a variety of assumptions about the goal of the problem and the character of optimal solutions. Some theoretical results and algorithms for handling haplotype assembly given the different models are then sketched. The primary conclusion is that some important simplified variants of the problem yield tractable problems while more general variants tend to be intractable in the worst case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population.
(1995) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040269 · Cited by 1,950
Inference of haplotypes from PCR-amplified samples of diploid populations.
(1990) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040591 · Cited by 765
Cited by
The Diploid Genome Sequence of an Individual Human
Levy, S., Sutton, G., Ng, P. C., Feuk, L., Halpern, A. L., Walenz, B. P., Axelrod, N., Huang, J., Kirkness, E. F., Denisov, G., et al. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050254 · Cited by 1,778
W hats H ap : Weighted Haplotype Assembly for Future-Generation Sequencing Reads
Patterson, M., Marschall, T., Pisanti, N., van Iersel, L., Stougie, L., Klau, G. W., & Schönhuth, A. (2015) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2014.0157 · Cited by 453
Korver, N., Quee, P. J., Boos, H. B. M., Simons, C. J. P., de Haan, L., & GROUP investigators (2012) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1352 · Cited by 270
Computational methods for chromosome-scale haplotype reconstruction
Garg, S. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02328-9 · Cited by 116
Accuracy Assessment of Diploid Consensus Sequences
Kim, J., Waterman, M., & Li, L. (2007) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2007.1007 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Lippert, R.
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W2129326667
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algorithmic strategies for the single nucleotide polymorphism haplotype assembly problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bib/3.1.23
- The paper
- Lippert, R. (2002). Algorithmic strategies for the single nucleotide polymorphism haplotype assembly problem. Briefings in Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/3.1.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.