The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP), a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene–environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods
Open accessAbstract
Objective: A longitudinal focus on gene–environment vulnerability and resilience in both patients, their unaffected family members and non‐related controls offers the opportunity to elucidate etiological and pathogenetic factors influencing the onset and course of psychotic disorders. The current paper delineates the objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment procedures of the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychoses (GROUP) study. Methods: A naturalistic longitudinal cohort study with assessments at baseline, after three and six years of follow‐up. The study is conducted by a consortium of four university psychiatric centres, with their affiliated mental health care institutions in the Netherlands covering more than 7.5 million inhabitants. Extensive assessment of genetic factors, environmental factors, (endo)phenotypes, and outcome. Results: At baseline, 1120 patients, 1057 siblings, 919 parents and 590 healthy controls were included. Conclusion: The GROUP study will contribute to insight in risk and protective factors in the aetiology of non‐affective psychotic disorders, and in the variation in their course and outcome. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Widiger, T. A. (2000) · Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3. · doi:10.1037/10518-009 · Cited by 19,744
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, Use, and Reliability
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 · Cited by 7,712
The Endophenotype Concept in Psychiatry: Etymology and Strategic Intentions
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636 · Cited by 5,615
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition
(2013) · American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.893619 · Cited by 4,383
Kapur, S. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13 · Cited by 2,813
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: II. Validity
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008 · Cited by 2,799
SCAN: Schedules fonr Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry
Wing, J. K. (1990) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810180089012 · Cited by 2,517
Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984
Andreasen, N. C. (1995) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · Cited by 2,423
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: Measures of internal consistency
Kim, S. W., Dysken, M. W., Pheley, A. M., & Hoover, K. M. (1994) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(94)90039-6 · Cited by 2,359
Cited by
Gene–Environment Interactions in Severe Mental Illness
Uher, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00048 · Cited by 251
Quee, P. J., van der Meer, L., Krabbendam, L., de Haan, L., Cahn, W., Wiersma, D., van Beveren, N., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., Mulder, C. L., Bruggeman, R., et al. (2014) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12138 · Cited by 29
Self-citationSubjective quality of life in psychosis: evidence for an association with real world functioning?
Leendertse, P., Myin-Germeys, I., Lataster, T., Simons, C. J. P., Oorschot, M., Lardinois, M., Schneider, M., van Os, J., & Reininghaus, U. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.074 · Cited by 24
Self-citationBoumans, J., Baart, I., Widdershoven, G., & Kroon, H. (2017) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2016.1178798 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Korver, N., Quee, P. J., Boos, H. B. M., Simons, C. J. P., de Haan, L., & GROUP investigators
- Venue
- International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 205-221
- ISSN
- 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-0657
- OpenAlex
- W1946774659
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 14.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP), a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene–environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mpr.1352
- The paper
- Korver, N., Quee, P. J., Boos, H. B. M., Simons, C. J. P., de Haan, L., & GROUP investigators. (2012). Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP), a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene–environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.