Cited by 24Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

OPUS-Rota4: a gradient-based protein side-chain modeling framework assisted by deep learning-based predictors

Open access
Xu, Gang, Wang, Qinghua, Ma, Jianpeng·2022·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate protein side-chain modeling is crucial for protein folding and protein design. In the past decades, many successful methods have been proposed to address this issue. However, most of them depend on the discrete samples from the rotamer library, which may have limitations on their accuracies and usages. In this study, we report an open-source toolkit for protein side-chain modeling, named OPUS-Rota4. It consists of three modules: OPUS-RotaNN2, which predicts protein side-chain dihedral angles; OPUS-RotaCM, which measures the distance and orientation information between the side chain of different residue pairs and OPUS-Fold2, which applies the constraints derived from the first two modules to guide side-chain modeling. OPUS-Rota4 adopts the dihedral angles predicted by OPUS-RotaNN2 as its initial states, and uses OPUS-Fold2 to refine the side-chain conformation with the side-chain contact map constraints derived from OPUS-RotaCM. Therefore, we convert the side-chain modeling problem into a side-chain contact map prediction problem. OPUS-Fold2 is written in Python and TensorFlow2.4, which is user-friendly to include other differentiable energy terms. OPUS-Rota4 also provides a platform in which the side-chain conformation can be dynamically adjusted under the influence of other processes. We apply OPUS-Rota4 on 15 FM predictions submitted by AlphaFold2 on CASP14, the results show that the side chains modeled by OPUS-Rota4 are closer to their native counterparts than those predicted by AlphaFold2 (e.g. the residue-wise RMSD for all residues and core residues are 0.588 and 0.472 for AlphaFold2, and 0.535 and 0.407 for OPUS-Rota4).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbab529

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, G., Wang, Q., & Ma, J.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, Jianpeng
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2021-12-15
Volume
23
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W4220891150
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Welch Foundation (Q‐1512, Q‐1826)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein folding, protein design, CASP14
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Cell Differentiation, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Gene Library, Protein Folding, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review