The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Clustering is a useful exploratory technique for the analysis of gene expression data. Many different heuristic clustering algorithms have been proposed in this context. Clustering algorithms based on probability models offer a principled alternative to heuristic algorithms. In particular, model-based clustering assumes that the data is generated by a finite mixture of underlying probability distributions such as multivariate normal distributions. The issues of selecting a ‘good’ clustering method and determining the ‘correct’ number of clusters are reduced to model selection problems in the probability framework. Gaussian mixture models have been shown to be a powerful tool for clustering in many applications. Results: We benchmarked the performance of model-based clustering on several synthetic and real gene expression data sets for which external evaluation criteria were available. The model-based approach has superior performance on our synthetic data sets, consistently selecting the correct model and the number of clusters. On real expression data, the model-based approach produced clusters of quality comparable to a leading heuristic clustering algorithm, but with the key advantage of suggesting the number of clusters and an appropriate model. We also explored the validity of the Gaussian mixture assumption on different transformations of real data. We also assessed the degree to which these real gene expression data sets fit multivariate Gaussian distributions both before and after subjecting them to commonly used data transformations. Suitably chosen transformations seem to result in reasonable fits. Availability: Mclust is available at http://www.stat.washington.edu/fraley/mclust. The software for the diagonal model is under development. Contact: kayee@cs.washington.edu Supplementary information: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/kayee/model * To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,052
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Rand, W. M. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356 · Cited by 6,566
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications
MARDIA, K. V. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 · Cited by 4,792
The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Aitchison, J. (1986) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4109-0 · Cited by 4,383
Lohrli, A. (1985) · Notes and Queries · doi:10.1093/notesj/32.3.377-a · Cited by 4,352
Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502760047131 · Cited by 4,257
Self-citationThe Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Piepel, G. F. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488337 · Cited by 3,418
Cited by
Density-Based Clustering Based on Hierarchical Density Estimates
Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., & Sander, J. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_14 · Cited by 2,680
Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J., & Golub, T. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1023949509487 · Cited by 2,116
Time-series clustering – A decade review
Aghabozorgi, S., Seyed Shirkhorshidi, A., & Ying Wah, T. (2015) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2015.04.007 · Cited by 1,826
Etzioni, R., Urban, N., Ramsey, S., McIntosh, M., Schwartz, S., Reid, B., Radich, J., Anderson, G., & Hartwell, L. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1041 · Cited by 1,155
Comprehensive and Integrated Genomic Characterization of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas
Abeshouse, A., Adebamowo, C., Adebamowo, S. N., Akbani, R., Akeredolu, T., Ally, A., Anderson, M. L., Anur, P., Appelbaum, E. L., Armenia, J., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.014 · Cited by 1,069
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeung, K. Y., Fraley, C., Murua, A., Raftery, A. E., & Ruzzo, W. L.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 977-987
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2146646206
- Cited by
- 869
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.10.977
- The paper
- Yeung, K. Y., Fraley, C., Murua, A., Raftery, A. E., & Ruzzo, W. L. (2001). Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.10.977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.