Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated extraction of information on protein–protein interactions from the biological literature

Open access
Ono, Toshihide, Hishigaki, Haretsugu, Tanigami, Akira, Takagi, Toshihisa·2001·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: To understand biological process, we must clarify how proteins interact with each other. However, since information about protein–protein interactions still exists primarily in the scientific literature, it is not accessible in a computer-readable format. Efficient processing of large amounts of interactions therefore needs an intelligent information extraction method. Our aim is to develop an efficient method for extracting information on protein–protein interaction from scientific literature. Results: We present a method for extracting information on protein–protein interactions from the scientific literature. This method, which employs only a protein name dictionary, surface clues on word patterns and simple part-of-speech rules, achieved high recall and precision rates for yeast (recall \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}86.8% and precision \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}94.3%) and Escherichia coli (recall \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}82.5% and precision \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}93.5%). The result of extraction suggests that our method should be applicable to any species for which a protein name dictionary is constructed. Availability: The program is available on request from the authors. Contact: ono@otsuka.gr.jp * To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.2.155

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Ono, T., Hishigaki, H., Tanigami, A., & Takagi, T.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
155-161
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2109070394
Cited by
398
References
13
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated extraction of information on protein–protein interactions from the biological literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.2.155
The paper
Ono, T., Hishigaki, H., Tanigami, A., & Takagi, T. (2001). Automated extraction of information on protein–protein interactions from the biological literature. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.2.155

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.