The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PreBIND and Textomy – mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The majority of experimentally verified molecular interaction and biological pathway data are present in the unstructured text of biomedical journal articles where they are inaccessible to computational methods. The Biomolecular interaction network database (BIND) seeks to capture these data in a machine-readable format. We hypothesized that the formidable task-size of backfilling the database could be reduced by using Support Vector Machine technology to first locate interaction information in the literature. We present an information extraction system that was designed to locate protein-protein interaction data in the literature and present these data to curators and the public for review and entry into BIND. RESULTS: Cross-validation estimated the support vector machine's test-set precision, accuracy and recall for classifying abstracts describing interaction information was 92%, 90% and 92% respectively. We estimated that the system would be able to recall up to 60% of all non-high throughput interactions present in another yeast-protein interaction database. Finally, this system was applied to a real-world curation problem and its use was found to reduce the task duration by 70% thus saving 176 days. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning methods are useful as tools to direct interaction and pathway database back-filling; however, this potential can only be realized if these techniques are coupled with human review and entry into a factual database such as BIND. The PreBIND system described here is available to the public at http://bind.ca. Current capabilities allow searching for human, mouse and yeast protein-interaction information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update
Wheeler, D. L. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh073 · Cited by 10,641
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 7,999
The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003
Boeckmann, B. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg095 · Cited by 3,890
Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G. D., Moore, L., Adams, S.-L., Millar, A., Taylor, P., Bennett, K., Boutilier, K., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415180a · Cited by 3,601
Self-citationBIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database
Bader, G. D. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.242 · Cited by 1,560
Self-citationInductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization
Dumais, S., Platt, J., Heckerman, D., & Sahami, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Information and knowledge management · doi:10.1145/288627.288651 · Cited by 1,461
MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences
Mewes, H. W. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.37 · Cited by 1,272
RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources
Pruitt, K. D. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.137 · Cited by 893
A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression
Jenssen, T.-K., Lægreid, A., Komorowski, J., & Hovig, E. J. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/88213 · Cited by 839
Cited by
von Mering, C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki005 · Cited by 1,764
Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery
Jensen, L. J., Saric, J., & Bork, P. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1768 · Cited by 631
The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database and related tools 2005 update
Alfarano, C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki051 · Cited by 587
Applications of Support Vector Machines in Chemistry
Ivanciuc, O. (2007) · Reviews in Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9780470116449.ch6 · Cited by 384
Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts
Chen, H., & Sharp, B. M. (2004) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-147 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Donaldson, I., Martin, J., de Bruijn, B., Wolting, C., Lay, V., Tuekam, B., Zhang, S., Baskin, B., Bader, G. D., Michalickova, K., Pawson, T., & Hogue, C. W.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2003-03-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139259976
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PreBIND and Textomy – mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-4-11
- The paper
- Donaldson, I., Martin, J., de Bruijn, B., Wolting, C., Lay, V., Tuekam, B., Zhang, S., Baskin, B., Bader, G. D., Michalickova, K., Pawson, T., & Hogue, C. W. (2003). PreBIND and Textomy – mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.