The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making sense of microarray data distributions
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Typical analysis of microarray data has focusedon spot by spot comparisons within a single organism. Less analysis has been done on the comparison of the entire distribution of spot intensities between experiments and between organisms. Results: Here we show that mRNA transcription data from a wide range of organisms and measured with a range of experimental platforms show close agreement with Benford’s law (Benford, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. , 78, 551–572, 1938) and Zipf’s law (Zipf, The Psycho-biology of Language: an Introduction to Dynamic Philology , 1936 and Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort , 1949). The distribution of the bulk of microarray spot intensities is well approximated by a log-normal with the tail of the distribution being closer to power law. The variance, σ2, of log spot intensity shows a positive correlation with genome size (in terms of number of genes) and is therefore relatively fixed within some range for a given organism. The measured value of σ2 can be significantly smaller than the expected value if the mRNA is extracted from a sample of mixed cell types. Our research demonstrates that useful biological findings may result from analyzing microarray data at the level of entire intensity distributions. Contact: david.c.hoyle@man.ac.uk * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic Expression Programs in the Response of Yeast Cells to Environmental Changes
Gasch, A. P., Spellman, P. T., Kao, C. M., Carmel-Harel, O., Eisen, M. B., Storz, G., Botstein, D., & Brown, P. O. (2000) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241 · Cited by 4,815
Hypoxia-induced gene expression profiling in the euryoxic fish Gillichthys mirabilis
Gracey, A. Y., Troll, J. V., & Somero, G. N. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.4.1993 · Cited by 561
Cited by
Deng, Y., Zhang, P., Qin, Y., Tu, Q., Yang, Y., He, Z., Schadt, C. W., & Zhou, J. (2016) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12981 · Cited by 465
Benchmarking of cell type deconvolution pipelines for transcriptomics data
Avila Cobos, F., Alquicira-Hernandez, J., Powell, J. E., Mestdagh, P., & De Preter, K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19015-1 · Cited by 446
Universality in network dynamics
Barzel, B., & Barabási, A.-L. (2013) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2741 · Cited by 396
The Landscape of Human Proteins Interacting with Viruses and Other Pathogens
Dyer, M. D., Murali, T. M., & Sobral, B. W. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0040032 · Cited by 331
RNA sequencing reveals two major classes of gene expression levels in metazoan cells
Hebenstreit, D., Fang, M., Gu, M., Charoensawan, V., van Oudenaarden, A., & Teichmann, S. A. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.28 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoyle, D. C., Rattray, M., Jupp, R., & Brass, A.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 576-584
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2133743912
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making sense of microarray data distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.576
- The paper
- Hoyle, D. C., Rattray, M., Jupp, R., & Brass, A. (2002). Making sense of microarray data distributions. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.