Cited by 51Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Socket2: a program for locating, visualizing and analyzing coiled-coil interfaces in protein structures

Open access
Kumar, Prasun, Woolfson, Derek N·2021·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Protein–protein interactions are central to all biological processes. One frequently observed mode of such interactions is the α-helical coiled coil (CC). Thus, an ability to extract, visualize and analyze CC interfaces quickly and without expert guidance would facilitate a wide range of biological research. In 2001, we reported Socket, which locates and characterizes CCs in protein structures based on the knobs-into-holes (KIH) packing between helices in CCs. Since then, studies of natural and de novo designed CCs have boomed, and the number of CCs in the RCSB PDB has increased rapidly. Therefore, we have updated Socket and made it accessible to expert and nonexpert users alike. Results: The original Socket only classified CCs with up to six helices. Here, we report Socket2, which rectifies this oversight to identify CCs with any number of helices, and KIH interfaces with any of the 20 proteinogenic residues or incorporating nonnatural amino acids. In addition, we have developed a new and easy-to-use web server with additional features. These include the use of NGL Viewer for instantly visualizing CCs, and tabs for viewing the sequence repeats, helix-packing angles and core-packing geometries of CCs identified and calculated by Socket2. Availability and implementation: Socket2 has been tested on all modern browsers. It can be accessed freely at http://coiledcoils.chm.bris.ac.uk/socket2/home.html. The source code is distributed using an MIT licence and available to download under the Downloads tab of the Socket2 home page.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab631

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Beesley J.L., Woolfson D.N. (2019) The de novo design of alpha-helical peptides for supramolecular self-assembly. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 58, 175– 182. 31039508
  2. Dawson W.M. et al (2019) Towards functional de novo designed proteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 52, 102– 111. 31336332
  3. Guzenko D., Strelkov S.V. (2018) CCFold: rapid and accurate prediction of coiled-coil structures and application to modelling intermediate filaments. Bioinformatics, 34, 215– 222. 28968723
  4. Heal J.W. et al (2018) Applying graph theory to protein structures: an Atlas of coiled coils. Bioinformatics, 34, 3316– 3323. 29722888 PMC6157074
  5. Joosten R.P. et al (2011) A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D411– D419. 21071423 PMC3013697
  6. Kabsch W., Sander C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577– 2637. 6667333
  7. Korendovych I.V., DeGrado W.F. (2020) De novo protein design, a retrospective. Q. Rev. Biophys., 53, e3. 32041676 PMC7243446
  8. Lapenta F. et al (2018) Coiled coil protein origami: from modular design principles towards biotechnological applications. Chem. Soc. Rev., 47, 3530– 3542. 29400389
  9. Ludwiczak J. et al (2019) DeepCoil-a fast and accurate prediction of coiled-coil domains in protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 35, 2790– 2795. 30601942
  10. Lupas A. (1996) Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. Trends Biochem. Sci., 21, 375– 382. 8918191
  11. Lupas A.N., Bassler J. (2017) Coiled coils—a model system for the 21st century. Trends Biochem. Sci., 42, 130– 140. 27884598
  12. Lupas A.N. et al (2017) The structure and topology of alpha-helical coiled coils. Subcell Biochem., 82, 95– 129. 28101860 PMC7122542
  13. Moutevelis E., Woolfson D.N. (2009) A periodic table of coiled-coil protein structures. J. Mol. Biol., 385, 726– 732. 19059267
  14. Rackham O.J. et al (2010) The evolution and structure prediction of coiled coils across all genomes. J. Mol. Biol., 403, 480– 493. 20813113
  15. Rhys G.G. et al (2018) Maintaining and breaking symmetry in homomeric coiled-coil assemblies. Nat. Commun., 9, 4132. 30297707 PMC6175849
  16. Rose A.S. et al (2018) NGL viewer: web-based molecular graphics for large complexes. Bioinformatics, 34, 3755– 3758. 29850778 PMC6198858
  17. Testa O.D. et al (2009) CC+: a relational database of coiled-coil structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D315– D322. 18842638 PMC2686509
  18. Wood C.W., Woolfson D.N. (2018) CCBuilder 2.0: powerful and accessible coiled-coil modeling. Protein Sci., 27, 103– 111. 28836317 PMC5734305
  19. Wood C.W. et al (2017) ISAMBARD: an open-source computational environment for biomolecular analysis, modelling and design. Bioinformatics, 33, 3043– 3050. 28582565 PMC5870769
  20. Woolfson D.N. (2021) A brief history of de novo protein design: minimal, rational, and computational. J. Mol. Biol., 167160. 34298061
  21. Woolfson D.N. et al (2015) De novo protein design: how do we expand into the universe of possible protein structures? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 33, 16– 26. 26093060

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, P., & Woolfson, D. N.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kumar, Prasun
  • Woolfson, Derek N
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2021-09-08
Volume
37
Issue
23
Pages
4575-4577
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W3198143332
Cited by
51
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R00661X/1)
  • BrisSynBio
  • Synthetic Biology Research Centre (BB/L01386X/1)
  • Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (WM140008)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
coiled coil, protein-protein interaction, protein structure analysis, helix packing, web server, NGL viewer, sequence repeats, unnatural amino acids
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical, Proteins, Software, Protein Structure, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review