Cited by 21Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

CoCoPRED: coiled-coil protein structural feature prediction from amino acid sequence using deep neural networks

Feng, Shi-Hao, Xia, Chun-Qiu, Shen, Hong-Bin·2022·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Coiled-coil is composed of two or more helices that are wound around each other. It widely exists in proteins and has been discovered to play a variety of critical roles in biology processes. Generally, there are three types of structural features in coiled-coil: coiled-coil domain (CCD), oligomeric state and register. However, most of the existing computational tools only focus on one of them. RESULTS: Here, we describe a new deep learning model, CoCoPRED, which is based on convolutional layers, bidirectional long short-term memory, and attention mechanism. It has three networks, i.e. CCD network, oligomeric state network, and register network, corresponding to the three types of structural features in coiled-coil. This means CoCoPRED has the ability of fulfilling comprehensive prediction for coiled-coil proteins. Through the 5-fold cross-validation experiment, we demonstrate that CoCoPRED can achieve better performance than the state-of-the-art models on both CCD prediction and oligomeric state prediction. Further analysis suggests the CCD prediction may be a performance indicator of the oligomeric state prediction in CoCoPRED. The attention heads in CoCoPRED indicate that registers a, b and e are more crucial for the oligomeric state prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CoCoPRED is available at http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/CoCoPRED. The datasets used in this research can also be downloaded from the website. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab744

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, S.-H., Xia, C.-Q., & Shen, H.-B.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China , Shanghai 200240, China
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shen, Hong-Bin
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2021-10-30
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
720-729
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W3211065052
Cited by
21
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61725302, 62073219)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
coiled-coil proteins, convolutional neural networks, bidirectional LSTM, attention mechanism
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Structure, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review