Cited by 47Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Drug–target interaction predictions with multi-view similarity network fusion strategy and deep interactive attention mechanism

Open access
Song, Wei, Xu, Lewen, Han, Chenguang, Tian, Zhen, Zou, Quan·2024·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Accurately identifying the drug–target interactions (DTIs) is one of the crucial steps in the drug discovery and drug repositioning process. Currently, many computational-based models have already been proposed for DTI prediction and achieved some significant improvement. However, these approaches pay little attention to fuse the multi-view similarity networks related to drugs and targets in an appropriate way. Besides, how to fully incorporate the known interaction relationships to accurately represent drugs and targets is not well investigated. Therefore, there is still a need to improve the accuracy of DTI prediction models. Results: In this study, we propose a novel approach that employs Multi-view similarity network fusion strategy and deep Interactive attention mechanism to predict Drug–Target Interactions (MIDTI). First, MIDTI constructs multi-view similarity networks of drugs and targets with their diverse information and integrates these similarity networks effectively in an unsupervised manner. Then, MIDTI obtains the embeddings of drugs and targets from multi-type networks simultaneously. After that, MIDTI adopts the deep interactive attention mechanism to further learn their discriminative embeddings comprehensively with the known DTI relationships. Finally, we feed the learned representations of drugs and targets to the multilayer perceptron model and predict the underlying interactions. Extensive results indicate that MIDTI significantly outperforms other baseline methods on the DTI prediction task. The results of the ablation experiments also confirm the effectiveness of the attention mechanism in the multi-view similarity network fusion strategy and the deep interactive attention mechanism. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/XuLew/MIDTI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae346

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various computational models for target prediction have been developed, leading to notable improvements in predictive accuracy and efficiency.

    “To this end, various computational models for target prediction have been developed, leading to notable improvements in predictive accuracy and efficiency38–40.”

    From Harnessing artificial intelligence to identify Bufalin as a molecular glue degrader of estrogen receptor alpha (2025) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction describes several computational approaches to drug–target prediction, and Results §3.2 reports improved predictive accuracy for the paper’s MIDTI model against baselines. The Introduction says computational approaches aim to accelerate screening, but the passages do not establish a notable improvement in predictive efficiency; that part of the claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, 785– 94.
  2. Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv, arXiv:1609.02907, 2016, preprint. · arXiv
  3. Quan Z, Guo Y, Lin X et al Graphcpi: Graph neural representation learning for compound-protein interaction. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE. 2019, 717–7 22.
  4. Shin B, Park S, Kang K et al Self-attention based molecule representation for predicting drug–target interaction. In: Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference. PMLR. 2019, 230–2 48.
  5. Veličković P, Cucurull G, Casanova A et al Graph attention networks. J. stat, 2017; 1050(20): 10– 48550.
  6. Zheng Y, Peng H, Zhang X et al Predicting drug targets from heterogeneous spaces using anchor graph hashing and ensemble learning. In: 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2018. 1– 7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, W., Xu, L., Han, C., Tian, Z., & Zou, Q.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tian, Zhen
  • Zou, Quan
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2024-06
Volume
40
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4399369411
Cited by
47
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 6
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation of China (62371423, 61801432)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
drug-target interaction prediction, drug repurposing, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Computational Biology, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review