Cited by 27Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

ProtMamba: a homology-aware but alignment-free protein state space model

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Protein language models are enabling advances in elucidating the sequence-to-function mapping, and have important applications in protein design. Models based on multiple sequence alignments efficiently capture the evolutionary information in homologous protein sequences, but multiple sequence alignment construction is imperfect. Results: We present ProtMamba, a homology-aware but alignment-free protein language model based on the Mamba architecture. In contrast with attention-based models, ProtMamba efficiently handles very long context, comprising hundreds of protein sequences. It is also computationally efficient. We train ProtMamba on a large dataset of concatenated homologous sequences, using two GPUs. We combine autoregressive modeling and masked language modeling through a fill-in-the-middle training objective. This makes the model adapted to various protein design applications. We demonstrate ProtMamba’s usefulness for sequence generation, motif inpainting, fitness prediction, and modeling intrinsically disordered regions. For homolog-conditioned sequence generation, ProtMamba outperforms state-of-the-art models. ProtMamba’s competitive performance, despite its relatively small size, sheds light on the importance of long-context conditioning. Availability and implementation: A Python implementation of ProtMamba is freely available in our GitHub repository: https://github.com/Bitbol-Lab/ProtMamba-ssm and archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15584634.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf348

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sgarbossa, D., Malbranke, C., & Bitbol, A.-F.
Affiliations
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
Corresponding author
Bitbol, Anne-Florence
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2025-06
Volume
41
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4411299343
Cited by
27
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (851173)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein language models, Mamba, protein design, fitness prediction, intrinsically disordered regions, masked language modeling
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Proteins, Software, Sequence Alignment, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review