LTR_STRUC: a novel search and identification program for LTR retrotransposons
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons constitute a substantial fraction of most eukaryotic genomes and are believed to have a significant impact on genome structure and function. Conventional methods used to search for LTR retrotransposons in genome databases are labor intensive. We present an efficient, reliable and automated method to identify and analyze members of this important class of transposable elements. Results: We have developed a new data-mining program, LTR_STRUC (LTR retrotransposon structure program) which identifies and automatically analyzes LTR retrotransposons in genome databases by searching for structural features characteristic of such elements. LTR_STRUC has significant advantages over conventional search methods in the case of LTR retrotransposon families having low sequence homology to known queries or families with atypical structure (e.g. non-autonomous elements lacking canonical retroviral ORFs) and is thus a discovery tool that complements established methods. LTR_STRUC finds LTR retrotransposons using an algorithm that encompasses a number of tasks that would otherwise have to be initiated individually by the user. For each LTR retrotransposon found, LTR_STRUC automatically generates an analysis of a variety of structural features of biological interest. Availability: The LTR_STRUC program is currently available as a console application free of charge to academic users from the authors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites
Yoder, J. A., Walsh, C. P., & Bestor, T. H. (1997) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01181-5 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
Terminal-repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIM) are involved in restructuring plant genomes
Witte, C., Le, Q. H., Bureau, T. E., & Kumar, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.241341898 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Bowen, N. J., & McDonald, J. F. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.164201 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationBowen, N. J., & McDonald, J. F. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.10.924 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationGenomic demography: a life-history analysis of transposable element evolution
Promislow, D., Jordan, I. K., & McDonald, J. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0815 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [3]3. Coffin,J.M., Hughes,S.H. and Varmus,H.E. (1997) Retroviruses, Plainview, Coldspring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dalloul, R. A., Long, J. A., Zimin, A. V., Aslam, L., Beal, K., Ann Blomberg, L., Bouffard, P., Burt, D. W., Crasta, O., Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., et al. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000475 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Identification, characterization and comparative genomics of chimpanzee endogenous retroviruses
Polavarapu, N., Bowen, N. J., & McDonald, J. F. (2006) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-6-r51 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“LTR_STRUC is designed specifically to find full-length LTR retrotransposons/endogenous retroviruses, that is, ones having two LTRs and a pair of target site duplications (TSDs) [11].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- McCarthy, E. M., & McDonald, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- ORCID
- McDonald, John F.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-02-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-367
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2163960662
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Keywords
- LTR retrotransposons, transposable element identification, genome mining, non-autonomous retrotransposons, eukaryotic genomes
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Database Management Systems, Software, Information Storage and Retrieval, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Retroelements, Terminal Repeat Sequences, Databases, Nucleic Acid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review