The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition
Abstract
Motivation: In order to enhance genome annotation, the fully automatic fold recognition method GenTHREADER has been improved and benchmarked. The previous version of GenTHREADER consisted of a simple neural network which was trained to combine sequence alignment score, length information and energy potentials derived from threading into a single score representing the relationship between two proteins, as designated by CATH. The improved version incorporates PSI-BLAST searches, which have been jumpstarted with structural alignment profiles from FSSP, and now also makes use of PSIPRED predicted secondary structure and bi-directional scoring in order to calculate the final alignment score. Pairwise potentials and solvation potentials are calculated from the given sequence alignment which are then used as inputs to a multi-layer, feed-forward neural network, along with the alignment score, alignment length and sequence length. The neural network has also been expanded to accommodate the secondary structure element alignment (SSEA) score as an extra input and it is now trained to learn the FSSP Z-score as a measurement of similarity between two proteins. Results: The improvements made to GenTHREADER increase the number of remote homologues that can be detected with a low error rate, implying higher reliability of score, whilst also increasing the quality of the models produced. We find that up to five times as many true positives can be detected with low error rate per query. Total MaxSub score is doubled at low false positive rates using the improved method. Availability: http://www.psipred.net Contact: l.mcguffin@cs.ucl.ac.uk * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Protein Structure Comparison by Alignment of Distance Matrices
Holm, L., & Sander, C. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489 · Cited by 3,984 · cited 1×
“The FSSP database is a fully automatic protein structure classification database which is compiled by carrying out all against all 3D comparisons on structures within the PDB, using the Dali search engine (Holm and Sander, 1993).”
MethodA new approach to protein fold recognition
Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358086a0 · Cited by 1,221
Self-citation
Cited by
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“…on structural features such as solvent exposure, secondary structure type, and hydrogen-bonding properties (Shi et al., 2001; Karchin et al., 2003; McGuffin and Jones, 2003; Zhou and Zhou, 2005) or on statistical potentials for residue interactions implied by the alignment (Sippl, 1990; Bowie et…”
BackgroundMethodRefinement of Protein Structures into Low-Resolution Density Maps Using Rosetta
DiMaio, F., Tyka, M. D., Baker, M. L., Chiu, W., & Baker, D. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.008 · Cited by 295
Rubin, E. B., Shemesh, Y., Cohen, M., Elgavish, S., Robertson, H. M., & Bloch, G. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5094806 · Cited by 257
A missing link between complex I and group 4 membrane-bound [NiFe] hydrogenases
Marreiros, B. C., Batista, A. P., Duarte, A. M. S., & Pereira, M. M. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.09.012 · Cited by 120
Hariharan, V., & Hancock, W. O. (2009) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-009-0059-5 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- McGuffin, L. J., & Jones, D. T.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 874-881
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2147059525
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.