The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial gene networks for objective comparison of analysis algorithms
Abstract
Motivation: Large-scale gene expression profiling generates data sets that are rich in observed features but poor in numbers of observations. The analysis of such data sets is a challenge that has been object of vigorous research. The algorithms in use for this purpose have been poorly documented and rarely compared objectively, posing a problem of uncertainty about the outcomes of the analyses. One way to objectively test such analysis algorithms is to apply them on computational gene network models for which the mechanisms are completely know. Results: We present a system that generates random artificial gene networks according to well-defined topological and kinetic properties. These are used to run in silico experiments simulating real laboratory microarray experiments. Noise with controlled properties is added to the simulation results several times emulating measurement replicates, before expression ratios are calculated. Availability: The data sets and kinetic models described here are available from http://www.vbi.vt.edu/~mendes/AGN/as biochemical dynamic models in SBML and Gepasi formats. Contact: mendes@vt.edu *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The large scale structure and dynamics of gene control circuits
Kauffman, S. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(74)80037-8 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Margolin, A. A., Nemenman, I., Basso, K., Wiggins, C., Stolovitzky, G., Favera, R. D., & Califano, A. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-s1-s7 · Cited by 2,420
Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models—A review
Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E., & Guthke, R. (2009) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.12.004 · Cited by 755
Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup
KELL, D. (2004) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.012 · Cited by 529
Greenfield, A., Madar, A., Ostrer, H., & Bonneau, R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013397 · Cited by 255
Bayesian ranking of biochemical system models
Vyshemirsky, V., & Girolami, M. A. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm607 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, P., Sha, W., & Ye, K.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09-27
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- ii122-ii129
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2137474062
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial gene networks for objective comparison of analysis algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1069
- The paper
- Mendes, P., Sha, W., & Ye, K. (2003). Artificial gene networks for objective comparison of analysis algorithms. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.