The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient sampling algorithm for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Biological and engineered networks have recently been shown to display network motifs: a small set of characteristic patterns that occur much more frequently than in randomized networks with the same degree sequence. Network motifs were demonstrated to play key information processing roles in biological regulation networks. Existing algorithms for detecting network motifs act by exhaustively enumerating all subgraphs with a given number of nodes in the network. The runtime of such algorithms increases strongly with network size. Here, we present a novel algorithm that allows estimation of subgraph concentrations and detection of network motifs at a runtime that is asymptotically independent of the network size. This algorithm is based on random sampling of subgraphs. Network motifs are detected with a surprisingly small number of samples in a wide variety of networks. Our method can be applied to estimate the concentrations of larger subgraphs in larger networks than was previously possible with exhaustive enumeration algorithms. We present results for high-order motifs in several biological networks and discuss their possible functions. Availability: A software tool for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs (mfinder 1.1) and further information is available at http://www.weizmann.ac.il/mcb/UriAlon/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · Cited by 7,368
Self-citationThe structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589
A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines
Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0901_7 · Cited by 3,402
Cited by
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches
Alon, U. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2102 · Cited by 3,279
Self-citationStructure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 892
Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution
Pržulj, N. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl301 · Cited by 837
FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detection
Wernicke, S., & Rasche, F. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl038 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Kashtan, N., Itzkovitz, S., Milo, R., & Alon, U.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1746-1758
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2124533460
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient sampling algorithm for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth163
- The paper
- Kashtan, N., Itzkovitz, S., Milo, R., & Alon, U. (2004). Efficient sampling algorithm for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.