The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conserved network motifs allow protein–protein interaction prediction
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: High-throughput protein interaction detection methods are strongly affected by false positive and false negative results. Focused experiments are needed to complement the large-scale methods by validating previously detected interactions but it is often difficult to decide which proteins to probe as interaction partners. Developing reliable computational methods assisting this decision process is a pressing need in bioinformatics. Results: We show that we can use the conserved properties of the protein network to identify and validate interaction candidates. We apply a number of machine learning algorithms to the protein connectivity information and achieve a surprisingly good overall performance in predicting interacting proteins. Using a ‘leave-one-out’ approach we find average success rates between 20 and 40% for predicting the correct interaction partner of a protein. We demonstrate that the success of these methods is based on the presence of conserved interaction motifs within the network. Availability: A reference implementation and a table with candidate interacting partners for each yeast protein are available at http://www.protsuggest.org.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · Cited by 7,368
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Cited by
Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 892
FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detection
Wernicke, S., & Rasche, F. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl038 · Cited by 745
Systems approach to explore components and interactions in the presynapse
Abul‐Husn, N. S., Bushlin, I., Morón, J. A., Jenkins, S. L., Dolios, G., Wang, R., Iyengar, R., Ma'ayan, A., & Devi, L. A. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800767 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Albert, I., & Albert, R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3346-3352
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2145100112
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserved network motifs allow protein–protein interaction prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth402
- The paper
- Albert, I., & Albert, R. (2004). Conserved network motifs allow protein–protein interaction prediction. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.