The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach
Open accessAbstract
MOTIVATION: Structural genomics projects are beginning to produce protein structures with unknown function, therefore, accurate, automated predictors of protein function are required if all these structures are to be properly annotated in reasonable time. Identifying the interface between two interacting proteins provides important clues to the function of a protein and can reduce the search space required by docking algorithms to predict the structures of complexes. RESULTS: We have combined a support vector machine (SVM) approach with surface patch analysis to predict protein-protein binding sites. Using a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure, we were able to successfully predict the location of the binding site on 76% of our dataset made up of proteins with both transient and obligate interfaces. With heterogeneous cross-validation, where we trained the SVM on transient complexes to predict on obligate complexes (and vice versa), we still achieved comparable success rates to the leave-one-out cross-validation suggesting that sufficient properties are shared between transient and obligate interfaces. AVAILABILITY: A web application based on the method can be found at http://www.bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk/ppi_pred. The dataset of 180 proteins used in this study is also available via the same web site. CONTACT: westhead@bmb.leeds.ac.uk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk/ppi-pred/supp-material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation
Livingstone, C. D., & Barton, G. J. (1993) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/9.6.745 · Cited by 550
Cited by
Mammone, A., Turchi, M., & Cristianini, N. (2009) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.49 · Cited by 699
The leucine-rich repeat structure
Bella, J., Hindle, K. L., McEwan, P. A., & Lovell, S. C. (2008) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-008-8019-0 · Cited by 466
Shoemaker, B. A., & Panchenko, A. R. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030043 · Cited by 332
CPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK
de Vries, S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017695 · Cited by 324
Tuncbag, N., Gursoy, A., Nussinov, R., & Keskin, O. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.367 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradford, J. R., & Westhead, D. R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1487-1494
- ISSN
- 0266-7061 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4803
- 1460-2059
- OpenAlex
- W2148219066
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti242
- The paper
- Bradford, J. R., & Westhead, D. R. (2005). Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.