The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SIRENE: supervised inference of regulatory networks
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Living cells are the product of gene expression programs that involve the regulated transcription of thousands of genes. The elucidation of transcriptional regulatory networks is thus needed to understand the cell's working mechanism, and can for example, be useful for the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. Although several methods have been proposed to infer gene regulatory networks from gene expression data, a recent comparison on a large-scale benchmark experiment revealed that most current methods only predict a limited number of known regulations at a reasonable precision level. Results: We propose SIRENE (Supervised Inference of Regulatory Networks), a new method for the inference of gene regulatory networks from a compendium of expression data. The method decomposes the problem of gene regulatory network inference into a large number of local binary classification problems, that focus on separating target genes from non-targets for each transcription factor. SIRENE is thus conceptually simple and computationally efficient. We test it on a benchmark experiment aimed at predicting regulations in Escherichia coli, and show that it retrieves of the order of 6 times more known regulations than other state-of-the-art inference methods. Availability: All data and programs are freely available at http://cbio.ensmp.fr/sirene. Contact: Fantine.Mordelet@ensmp.fr
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inferring Genetic Networks and Identifying Compound Mode of Action via Expression Profiling
Gardner, T. S., di Bernardo, D., Lorenz, D., & Collins, J. J. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1081900 · Cited by 1,117
Salgado, H. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj156 · Cited by 368
Cited by
Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
The DREAM5 Consortium, Marbach, D., Costello, J. C., Küffner, R., Vega, N. M., Prill, R. J., Camacho, D. M., Allison, K. R., Kellis, M., Collins, J. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2016 · Cited by 1,667
Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models—A review
Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E., & Guthke, R. (2009) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.12.004 · Cited by 755
Data based identification and prediction of nonlinear and complex dynamical systems
Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Grebogi, C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.004 · Cited by 299
Review on statistical methods for gene network reconstruction using expression data
Wang, Y. X. R., & Huang, H. (2014) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.040 · Cited by 182
Network Medicine in Pathobiology
Lee, L. Y.-H., & Loscalzo, J. (2019) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.03.009 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Mordelet, F., & Vert, J.-P.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-08-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- i76-i82
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2160095931
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SIRENE: supervised inference of regulatory networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn273
- The paper
- Mordelet, F., & Vert, J.-P. (2008). SIRENE: supervised inference of regulatory networks. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.