The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ProtorP: a protein–protein interaction analysis server
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The PROTORP server analyses protein–protein associations in 3D structures. The server calculates a series of physical and chemical parameters of the protein interaction sites that contribute to the binding energy of the association. These parameters include, size and shape, intermolecular bonding, residue and atom composition and secondary structure contributions. The server is flexible, in that it allows users to analyse individual protein associations or large datasets of associations deposited in the PDB, or upload and analyse proprietary files. The properties calculated can be compared with parameter distributions for non-homologous datasets of different classes of protein associations provided on the server website. The server provides an efficient way of characterizing protein–protein associations of new or existing proteins, and a means of putting these values in the context of previously observed associations. Availability: http://www.bioinformatics.sussex.ac.uk/protorp Contact: s.jones@sussex.ac.uk
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Self-citationHot spots—A review of the protein–protein interface determinant amino‐acid residues
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21396 · Cited by 760
Cited by
Helical Assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 Complex in TLR/IL-1R Signalling
Lin, S.-C., Lo, Y.-C., & Wu, H. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09121 · Cited by 1,111
Inhibition of RAS function through targeting an allosteric regulatory site
Spencer-Smith, R., Koide, A., Zhou, Y., Eguchi, R. R., Sha, F., Gajwani, P., Santana, D., Gupta, A., Jacobs, M., Herrero-Garcia, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2231 · Cited by 283
Human Cancer Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Structural Perspective
Kar, G., Gursoy, A., & Keskin, O. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000601 · Cited by 235
Koide, A., Wojcik, J., Gilbreth, R. N., Hoey, R. J., & Koide, S. (2012) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.12.019 · Cited by 227
2P2Idb: a structural database dedicated to orthosteric modulation of protein–protein interactions
Basse, M. J., Betzi, S., Bourgeas, R., Bouzidi, S., Chetrit, B., Hamon, V., Morelli, X., & Roche, P. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1002 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, C., Damerell, D., & Jones, S.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-11-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413-414
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2114027069
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ProtorP: a protein–protein interaction analysis server. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn584
- The paper
- Reynolds, C., Damerell, D., & Jones, S. (2009). ProtorP: a protein–protein interaction analysis server. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
