The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
microPred: effective classification of pre-miRNAs for human miRNA gene prediction
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: In this article, we show that the classification of human precursor microRNA (pre-miRNAs) hairpins from both genome pseudo hairpins and other non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) is a common and essential requirement for both comparative and non-comparative computational recognition of human miRNA genes. However, the existing computational methods do not address this issue completely or successfully. Here we present the development of an effective classifier system (named as microPred) for this classification problem by using appropriate machine learning techniques. Our approach includes the introduction of more representative datasets, extraction of new biologically relevant features, feature selection, handling of class imbalance problem in the datasets and extensive classifier performance evaluation via systematic cross-validation methods. Results: Our microPred classifier yielded higher and, especially, much more reliable classification results in terms of both sensitivity (90.02%) and specificity (97.28%) than the exiting pre-miRNA classification methods. When validated with 6095 non-human animal pre-miRNAs and 139 virus pre-miRNAs from miRBase, microPred resulted in 92.71% (5651/6095) and 94.24% (131/139) recognition rates, respectively. Availability: The microPred classifier, the datasets used, and the features extracted are freely available at http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/people/ManoharaRukshan.Batuwita/microPred.htm. Contact: manb@comlab.ox.ac.uk; vasile.palade@comlab.ox.ac.uk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction
Zuker, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg595 · Cited by 13,404
Mining with rarity: a unifying framework
Weiss, G. M. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007734 · Cited by 1,393
Cited by
Practical Aspects of microRNA Target Prediction
M. Witkos, T., Koscianska, E., & J. Krzyzosiak, W. (2011) · Current Molecular Medicine · doi:10.2174/156652411794859250 · Cited by 466
A broad review on class imbalance learning techniques
Rezvani, S., & Wang, X. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110415 · Cited by 281
Martí, E., Pantano, L., Bañez-Coronel, M., Llorens, F., Miñones-Moyano, E., Porta, S., Sumoy, L., Ferrer, I., & Estivill, X. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq575 · Cited by 276
Yang, P., Yoo, P. D., Fernando, J., Zhou, B. B., Zhang, Z., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2013.2257480 · Cited by 90
Sample Subset Optimization for Classifying Imbalanced Biological Data
Yang, P., Zhang, Z., Zhou, B. B., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20847-8_28 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Batuwita, R., & Palade, V.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-02-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 989-995
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2140751493
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: microPred: effective classification of pre-miRNAs for human miRNA gene prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp107
- The paper
- Batuwita, R., & Palade, V. (2009). microPred: effective classification of pre-miRNAs for human miRNA gene prediction. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.