Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 568

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modeling sample variables with an Experimental Factor Ontology

Open access
Malone, James, Holloway, Ele, Adamusiak, Tomasz, Kapushesky, Misha, Zheng, Jie, Kolesnikov, Nikolay, Zhukova, Anna, Brazma, Alvis, Parkinson, Helen·2010·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Describing biological sample variables with ontologies is complex due to the cross-domain nature of experiments. Ontologies provide annotation solutions; however, for cross-domain investigations, multiple ontologies are needed to represent the data. These are subject to rapid change, are often not interoperable and present complexities that are a barrier to biological resource users. Results: We present the Experimental Factor Ontology, designed to meet cross-domain, application focused use cases for gene expression data. We describe our methodology and open source tools used to create the ontology. These include tools for creating ontology mappings, ontology views, detecting ontology changes and using ontologies in interfaces to enhance querying. The application of reference ontologies to data is a key problem, and this work presents guidelines on how community ontologies can be presented in an application ontology in a data-driven way. Availability: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo Contact: malone@ebi.ac.uk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq099

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Blake, 2008, The Gene Ontology (GO) project: structured vocabularies for molecular biology and their application to genome and expression analysis, Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, 10.1002/0471250953.bi0702s23 · DOI
  2. Bizer, 2009, Linked data - the story so far, Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst., 5, 1
  3. Grenon, 2004, SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology, Spat. Cogn. Comput.Interdiscip. J., 4, 69, 10.1207/s15427633scc0401_5 · doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0401_5
  4. Gómez-Pérez, 2004, Ontological engineering.
  5. Horridge, 2009, The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies, Proceedings of the OWL: Experiences and Directions 2009, Chantilly, USA, CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
  6. Horrocks, 2003, From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a web ontology language, J. Web Sem., 1, 7, 10.1016/j.websem.2003.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Jonquet, 2009, Prototyping a Biomedical Ontology Recommender Service, 65
  8. Kapushesky, 2010, Gene Expression Atlas at the European Bioinformatics Institute, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D690, 10.1093/nar/gkp936 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Malone, 2008, Developing an application focused experimental factor ontology: embracing the OBO community
  10. Noy, 2009, BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, W170, 10.1093/nar/gkp440 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Osborne, 2009, Annotating the human genome with Disease Ontology, BMC Genomics, 10, S1, 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S1-S6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Parkinson, 2009, ArrayExpress update–from an archive of functional genomics experiments to the atlas of gene expression, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D868, 10.1093/nar/gkn889 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Phillips, 1990, Hanging on the Metaphone, Comput. Lang., 7, 39
  14. Phillips, 2000, The Double Metaphone Search Algorithm, C/C++ User's Journal, 18, 38
  15. Rosse, 2003, A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy, J. Biomed. Inform., 36, 478, 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Schofield, 2009, Post-publication sharing of data and tools, Nature, 461, 171, 10.1038/461171a · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sirin, 2007, Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner, J. Web Sem., 5, 51, 10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Smith, 2005, Relations in biomedical ontologies, Genome Biol., 6, R46, 10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Smith, 2007, The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration, Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 1251, 10.1038/nbt1346 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Stevens, 2000, Ontology-based knowledge representation for bioinformatics, Brief. Bioinformatics, 1, 398, 10.1093/bib/1.4.398 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Uschold, 1996, Ontologies: principles, methods and applications, Knowl. Eng. Rev., 11, 93, 10.1017/S0269888900007797 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 568

Metadata

Authors
Malone, J., Holloway, E., Adamusiak, T., Kapushesky, M., Zheng, J., Kolesnikov, N., Zhukova, A., Brazma, A., & Parkinson, H.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1112-1118
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2147018385
Cited by
568
References
0
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling sample variables with an Experimental Factor Ontology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq099
The paper
Malone, J., Holloway, E., Adamusiak, T., Kapushesky, M., Zheng, J., Kolesnikov, N., Zhukova, A., Brazma, A., & Parkinson, H. (2010). Modeling sample variables with an Experimental Factor Ontology. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.