The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ontologies: principles, methods and applications
Abstract
This paper is intended to serve as a comprehensive introduction to the emerging field concerned with the design and use of ontologies. We observe that disparate backgrounds, languages, tools and techniques are a major barrier to effective communication among people, organisations and/or software understanding (i.e. an “ontology”) in a given subject area, can improve such communication, which in turn, can give rise to greater reuse and sharing, inter-operability, and more reliable software. After motivating their need, we clarify just what ontologies are and what purpose they serve. We outline a methodology for developing and evaluating ontologies, first discussing informal techniques, concerning such issues as scoping, handling ambiguity, reaching agreement and producing definitions. We then consider the benefits and describe, a more formal approach. We re-visit the scoping phase, and discuss the role of formal languages and techniques in the specification, implementation and evalution of ontologies. Finally, we review the state of the art and practice in this emerging field, considering various case studies, software tools for ontology development, key research issues and future prospects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.042313.00197 · Cited by 2,861
“Further ontologies are discussed extensively as principles, methods, and applications in perspective [138].”
The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Osterwalder, A. (2004) · Unknown · doi:10.22005/bcu.15985 · Cited by 1,932
The Semantic Web: the roles of XML and RDF
Decker, S., Melnik, S., van Harmelen, F., Fensel, D., Klein, M., Broekstra, J., Erdmann, M., & Horrocks, I. (2000) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/4236.877487 · Cited by 743
Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (FOIS 2025)
(2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.3233/faia409 · Cited by 470
Gutierrez, C., & Sequeda, J. F. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3418294 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M.
- Venue
- The Knowledge Engineering Review
- Publisher
- Maximum Academic Press
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-136
- ISSN
- 0269-8889 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8005
- OpenAlex
- W2124957697
- Cited by
- 3,524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0269888900007797
- The paper
- Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900007797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.