The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying the Naïve Bayes classifier with kernel density estimation to the prediction of protein–protein interaction sites
Abstract
Motivation: The limited availability of protein structures often restricts the functional annotation of proteins and the identification of their protein–protein interaction sites. Computational methods to identify interaction sites from protein sequences alone are, therefore, required for unraveling the functions of many proteins. This article describes a new method (PSIVER) to predict interaction sites, i.e. residues binding to other proteins, in protein sequences. Only sequence features (position-specific scoring matrix and predicted accessibility) are used for training a Naïve Bayes classifier (NBC), and conditional probabilities of each sequence feature are estimated using a kernel density estimation method (KDE). Results: The leave-one out cross-validation of PSIVER achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.151, an F-measure of 35.3%, a precision of 30.6% and a recall of 41.6% on a non-redundant set of 186 protein sequences extracted from 105 heterodimers in the Protein Data Bank (consisting of 36 219 residues, of which 15.2% were known interface residues). Even though the dataset used for training was highly imbalanced, a randomization test demonstrated that the proposed method managed to avoid overfitting. PSIVER was also tested on 72 sequences not used in training (consisting of 18 140 residues, of which 10.6% were known interface residues), and achieved an MCC of 0.135, an F-measure of 31.5%, a precision of 25.0% and a recall of 46.5%, outperforming other publicly available servers tested on the same dataset. PSIVER enables experimental biologists to identify potential interface residues in unknown proteins from sequence information alone, and to mutate those residues selectively in order to unravel protein functions. Availability: Freely available on the web at http://tardis.nibio.go.jp/PSIVER/ Contact: yoichi@nibio.go.jp; kenji@nibio.go.jp Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
Bradley, A. P. (1997) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2 · Cited by 7,217
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“• MCC indicates the degree of the correlation between the actual and predicted classes of the residues (Matthews, 1975).”
BackgroundThe class imbalance problem: A systematic study1
Japkowicz, N., & Stephen, S. (2002) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-2002-6504 · Cited by 3,295
Cited by
Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning
Gainza, P., Sverrisson, F., Monti, F., Rodolà, E., Boscaini, D., Bronstein, M. M., & Correia, B. E. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · Cited by 834
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569
Zeng, M., Zhang, F., Wu, F.-X., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Li, M. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz699 · Cited by 281
Identification of Antioxidants from Sequence Information Using Naïve Bayes
Feng, P.-M., Lin, H., & Chen, W. (2013) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2013/567529 · Cited by 109
Li, S., Wu, S., Wang, L., Li, F., Jiang, H., & Bai, F. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Murakami, Y., & Mizuguchi, K.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1841-1848
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2155194485
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applying the Naïve Bayes classifier with kernel density estimation to the prediction of protein–protein interaction sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq302
- The paper
- Murakami, Y., & Mizuguchi, K. (2010). Applying the Naïve Bayes classifier with kernel density estimation to the prediction of protein–protein interaction sites. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.