Cited by 42Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Structure and Dynamics

Recent advances in predicting protein–protein interactions with the aid of artificial intelligence algorithms

Li, Shiwei, Wu, Sanan, Wang, Lin, Li, Fenglei, Jiang, Hualiang, Bai, Fang·2022·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are essential in the regulation of biological functions and cell events, therefore understanding PPIs have become a key issue to understanding the molecular mechanism and investigating the design of drugs. Here we highlight the major developments in computational methods developed for predicting PPIs by using types of artificial intelligence algorithms. The first part introduces the source of experimental PPI data. The second part is devoted to the PPI prediction methods based on sequential information. The third part covers representative methods using structural information as the input feature. The last part is methods designed by combining different types of features. For each part, the state-of-the-art computational PPI prediction methods are reviewed in an inclusive view. Finally, we discuss the flaws existing in this area and future directions of next-generation algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344

Cites

186 of 186 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI and deep learning are being developed and applied to experimental determination and prediction of macromolecular structures and to protein-protein interactions.

    “AI and deep learning are also being developed and applied to experimental determination and prediction of macromolecular structures,198 as well as to PPIs.199,200”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [200]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, S., Wu, S., Wang, L., Li, F., Jiang, H., & Bai, F.
Affiliations
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Bai, Fang
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
73
Pages
102344
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213382600
Cited by
42
References
186
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, protein-protein interaction prediction, artificial intelligence, machine learning, sequence-based prediction, structural features, drug design
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review