The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein–protein interaction site prediction through combining local and global features with deep neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) play important roles in many biological processes. Conventional biological experiments for identifying PPI sites are costly and time-consuming. Thus, many computational approaches have been proposed to predict PPI sites. Existing computational methods usually use local contextual features to predict PPI sites. Actually, global features of protein sequences are critical for PPI site prediction. Results: A new end-to-end deep learning framework, named DeepPPISP, through combining local contextual and global sequence features, is proposed for PPI site prediction. For local contextual features, we use a sliding window to capture features of neighbors of a target amino acid as in previous studies. For global sequence features, a text convolutional neural network is applied to extract features from the whole protein sequence. Then the local contextual and global sequence features are combined to predict PPI sites. By integrating local contextual and global sequence features, DeepPPISP achieves the state-of-the-art performance, which is better than the other competing methods. In order to investigate if global sequence features are helpful in our deep learning model, we remove or change some components in DeepPPISP. Detailed analyses show that global sequence features play important roles in DeepPPISP. Availability and implementation: The DeepPPISP web server is available at http://bioinformatics.csu.edu.cn/PPISP/. The source code can be obtained from https://github.com/CSUBioGroup/DeepPPISP. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network
Han, J.-D. J., Bertin, N., Hao, T., Goldberg, D. S., Berriz, G. F., Zhang, L. V., Dupuy, D., Walhout, A. J. M., Cusick, M. E., Roth, F. P., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02555 · Cited by 1,798
Protein–Protein Interactions Essentials: Key Concepts to Building and Analyzing Interactome Networks
De Las Rivas, J., & Fontanillo, C. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000807 · Cited by 644
Prediction‐based fingerprints of protein–protein interactions
Porollo, A., & Meller, J. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21248 · Cited by 436
Are protein–protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?
Caffrey, D. R., Somaroo, S., Hughes, J. D., Mintseris, J., & Huang, E. S. (2004) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.03323604 · Cited by 339
Murakami, Y., & Mizuguchi, K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq302 · Cited by 303
Chen, H., & Zhou, H. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20514 · Cited by 282
Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks
Fariselli, P., Pazos, F., Valencia, A., & Casadio, R. (2002) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02767.x · Cited by 271
ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence
Ofran, Y., & Rost, B. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl303 · Cited by 258
Predicted protein–protein interaction sites from local sequence information
Ofran, Y., & Rost, B. (2003) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00456-3 · Cited by 255
PSAIA – Protein Structure and Interaction Analyzer
Mihel, J., Šikić, M., Tomić, S., Jeren, B., & Vlahoviček, K. (2008) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-8-21 · Cited by 192
Cited by
Li, S., Wu, S., Wang, L., Li, F., Jiang, H., & Bai, F. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · Cited by 42
Artificial intelligence approaches to human-microbiome protein–protein interactions
Lim, H., Cankara, F., Tsai, C.-J., Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., & Gursoy, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102328 · Cited by 39
Seq-InSite: sequence supersedes structure for protein interaction site prediction
Hosseini, S., Golding, G. B., & Ilie, L. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad738 · Cited by 26
DeepSS2GO: protein function prediction from secondary structure
Song, F. V., Su, J., Huang, S., Zhang, N., Li, K., Ni, M., & Liao, M. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae196 · Cited by 26
Genome-scale annotation of protein binding sites via language model and geometric deep learning
(2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.02.565344 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, M., Zhang, F., Wu, F.-X., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Li, M.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-09-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1114-1120
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2971405760
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein–protein interaction site prediction through combining local and global features with deep neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz699
- The paper
- Zeng, M., Zhang, F., Wu, F.-X., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Li, M. (2020). Protein–protein interaction site prediction through combining local and global features with deep neural networks. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.