Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kaviar: an accessible system for testing SNV novelty

Open access
Glusman, Gustavo, Caballero, Juan, Mauldin, Denise E., Hood, Leroy, Roach, Jared C.·2011·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: With the rapidly expanding availability of data from personal genomes, exomes and transcriptomes, medical researchers will frequently need to test whether observed genomic variants are novel or known. This task requires downloading and handling large and diverse datasets from a variety of sources, and processing them with bioinformatics tools and pipelines. Alternatively, researchers can upload data to online tools, which may conflict with privacy requirements. We present here Kaviar, a tool that greatly simplifies the assessment of novel variants. Kaviar includes: (i) an integrated and growing database of genomic variation from diverse sources, including over 55 million variants from personal genomes, family genomes, transcriptomes, SNV databases and population surveys; and (ii) software for querying the database efficiently. Availability: Kaviar is programmed in Perl and offered free of charge as Open Source Software. Kaviar may be used online as a programmatic web service or downloaded for local use from http://db.systemsbiology.net/kaviar. The database is also provided. Contact: gustavo@systemsbiology.org Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr540

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Amigo, 2011, ENGINES: exploring single nucleotide variation in entire human genomes, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 105, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-105 · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-105
  2. Auffray, 2009, Systems medicine: the future of medical genomics and healthcare, Genome Med., 1, 2, 10.1186/gm2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blekhman, 2010, Sex-specific and lineage-specific alternative splicing in primates, Genome Res., 20, 180, 10.1101/gr.099226.109 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Danecek, 2011, The variant call format and VCFtools, Bioinformatics, 27, 2156, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Day, 2010, dbSNP in the detail and copy number complexities, Hum. Mutat., 31, 2, 10.1002/humu.21149 · DOI
  6. Green, 2010, A draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome, Science, 328, 710, 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Koboldt, 2009, VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples, Bioinformatics, 25, 2283, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp373 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hubley, 2003, Evolutionary algorithms for the selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms, BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 30, 10.1186/1471-2105-4-30 · DOI
  9. Li, 2010, Resequencing of 200 human exomes identifies an excess of low-frequency non-synonymous coding variants.Nat, Genet., 42, 969
  10. Ngamphiw, 2011, PanSNPdb: the Pan-Asian SNP genotyping database, PLoS One, 6, e21451, 10.1371/journal.pone.0021451 · DOI
  11. Paananen, 2010, Varietas: a functional variation database portal, Database, baq016
  12. Pelak, 2010, The characterization of twenty sequenced human genomes, PLoS Genet., 6, e1001111, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001111 · DOI
  13. Reese, 2010, A standard variation file format for human genome sequences, Genome Biol., 11, R88, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r88 · DOI
  14. Roach, 2006, Genetic mapping at 3-kilobase resolution reveals inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 as a risk factor for type 1 diabetes in Sweden, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 79, 614, 10.1086/507876 · DOI
  15. Schuster, 2010, Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa, Nature, 463, 943, 10.1038/nature08795 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Shetty, 2010, SeqAnt: a web service to rapidly identify and annotate DNA sequence variations, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 471, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-471 · DOI

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Glusman, G., Caballero, J., Mauldin, D. E., Hood, L., & Roach, J. C.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
27
Issue
22
Pages
3216-3217
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2146481951
Cited by
219
References
6
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kaviar: an accessible system for testing SNV novelty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr540
The paper
Glusman, G., Caballero, J., Mauldin, D. E., Hood, L., & Roach, J. C. (2011). Kaviar: an accessible system for testing SNV novelty. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr540

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.