Cited by 22Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Qualitative translation of relations from BioPAX to SBML qual

Open access
Büchel, Finja, Wrzodek, Clemens, Mittag, Florian, Dräger, Andreas, Eichner, Johannes, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Le Novère, Nicolas, Zell, Andreas·2012·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The biological pathway exchange language (BioPAX) and the systems biology markup language (SBML) belong to the most popular modeling and data exchange languages in systems biology. The focus of SBML is quantitative modeling and dynamic simulation of models, whereas the BioPAX specification concentrates mainly on visualization and qualitative analysis of pathway maps. BioPAX describes reactions and relations. In contrast, SBML core exclusively describes quantitative processes such as reactions. With the SBML qualitative models extension (qual), it has recently also become possible to describe relations in SBML. Before the development of SBML qual, relations could not be properly translated into SBML. Until now, there exists no BioPAX to SBML converter that is fully capable of translating both reactions and relations. Results: The entire nature pathway interaction database has been converted from BioPAX (Level 2 and Level 3) into SBML (Level 3 Version 1) including both reactions and relations by using the new qual extension package. Additionally, we present the new webtool BioPAX2SBML for further BioPAX to SBML conversions. Compared with previous conversion tools, BioPAX2SBML is more comprehensive, more robust and more exact. Availability: BioPAX2SBML is freely available at http://webservices.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/ and the complete collection of the PID models is available at http://www.cogsys.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/downloads/Qualitative-Models/. Contact: finja.buechel@uni-tuebingen.de Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts508

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whereas SBML and CellML focus on quantitative modelling and dynamic simulation, BioPAX concentrates primarily on quantitative processes and visualization.

    “Whereas SBML and CellML focus on quantitative modelling and dynamic simulation, BioPAX concentrates primarily on quantitative processes and visualization [15, 30].”

    From Adapting modeling and simulation credibility standards to computational systems biology (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Abstract says BioPAX focuses on visualization and qualitative analysis, not quantitative processes; it assigns quantitative processes to SBML core. The Introduction likewise describes BioPAX as mainly used for qualitative analysis and information exchange. These passages do not address CellML. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Büchel, F., Wrzodek, C., Mittag, F., Dräger, A., Eichner, J., Rodriguez, N., Le Novère, N., & Zell, A.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • 1 Center for Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT), University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany and 2European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, UK
Corresponding author
Büchel, Finja
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2012-08-24
Volume
28
Issue
20
Pages
2648-2653
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2157904870
Cited by
22
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J019305/1, BB/F023545/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
BioPAX, qualitative modeling, SBML, pathway maps, model transformation, web-based tool
MeSH terms
Humans, Programming Languages, Software, Databases, Factual, Internet, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review