Cited by 281Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

BioModels: ten-year anniversary

Open access
Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi, Juty, Nick, Ajmera, Ishan, Ali, Raza, Dumousseau, Marine, Glont, Mihai, Hucka, Michael, Jalowicki, Gaël +12 more·2015·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

BioModels (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/) is a repository of mathematical models of biological processes. A large set of models is curated to verify both correspondence to the biological process that the model seeks to represent, and reproducibility of the simulation results as described in the corresponding peer-reviewed publication. Many models submitted to the database are annotated, cross-referencing its components to external resources such as database records, and terms from controlled vocabularies and ontologies. BioModels comprises two main branches: one is composed of models derived from literature, while the second is generated through automated processes. BioModels currently hosts over 1200 models derived directly from the literature, as well as in excess of 140,000 models automatically generated from pathway resources. This represents an approximate 60-fold growth for literature-based model numbers alone, since BioModels' first release a decade ago. This article describes updates to the resource over this period, which include changes to the user interface, the annotation profiles of models in the curation pipeline, major infrastructure changes, ability to perform online simulations and the availability of model content in Linked Data form. We also outline planned improvements to cope with a diverse array of new challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gku1181

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chelliah, V., Juty, N., Ajmera, I., Ali, R., Dumousseau, M., Glont, M., Hucka, M., Jalowicki, G., Keating, S., Knight-Schrijver, V., Lloret-Villas, A., Natarajan, K. N., Pettit, J.-B., Rodriguez, N., Schubert, M., Wimalaratne, S. M., Zhao, Y., Hermjakob, H., Le Novère, N., & Laibe, C.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Babraham Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2014-11-20
Volume
43
Issue
D1
Pages
D542-D548
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2147814423
Cited by
281
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 13
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • California Institute of Technology
  • University of Connecticut
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • European Commission (312455, 305299, 115156)
  • Universiteit Stellenbosch
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (115156)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F010516/1, BB/K016946/1, BB/J019305/1, 1443802)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM070923)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
biomodels, model repository, model curation, model annotation, web-based simulation, linked data
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Biological, Databases, Factual, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review