The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GAT: a simulation framework for testing the association of genomic intervals
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: A common question in genomic analysis is whether two sets of genomic intervals overlap significantly. This question arises, for example, when interpreting ChIP-Seq or RNA-Seq data in functional terms. Because genome organization is complex, answering this question is non-trivial. Summary: We present Genomic Association Test (GAT), a tool for estimating the significance of overlap between multiple sets of genomic intervals. GAT implements a null model that the two sets of intervals are placed independently of one another, but allows each set’s density to depend on external variables, for example, isochore structure or chromosome identity. GAT estimates statistical significance based on simulation and controls for multiple tests using the false discovery rate. Availability: GAT’s source code, documentation and tutorials are available at http://code.google.com/p/genomic-association-tester. Contact: andreas.heger@dpag.ox.ac.uk
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions
McLean, C. Y., Bristor, D., Hiller, M., Clarke, S. L., Schaar, B. T., Lowe, C. B., Wenger, A. M., & Bejerano, G. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1630 · Cited by 4,502
Cited by
Convergent regulatory evolution and loss of flight in paleognathous birds
Sackton, T. B., Grayson, P., Cloutier, A., Hu, Z., Liu, J. S., Wheeler, N. E., Gardner, P. P., Clarke, J. A., Baker, A. J., Clamp, M., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7244 · Cited by 291
Schafer, S. T., Paquola, A. C. M., Stern, S., Gosselin, D., Ku, M., Pena, M., Kuret, T. J. M., Liyanage, M., Mansour, A. A., Jaeger, B. N., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0295-x · Cited by 288
A Common Embryonic Origin of Stem Cells Drives Developmental and Adult Neurogenesis
Berg, D. A., Su, Y., Jimenez-Cyrus, D., Patel, A., Huang, N., Morizet, D., Lee, S., Shah, R., Ringeling, F. R., Jain, R., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.010 · Cited by 267
CpG island hypermethylation mediated by DNMT3A is a consequence of AML progression
Spencer, D. H., Russler-Germain, D. A., Ketkar, S., Helton, N. M., Lamprecht, T. L., Fulton, R. S., Fronick, C. C., O’Laughlin, M., Heath, S. E., Shinawi, M., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.021 · Cited by 219
Single-cell DNA methylation and 3D genome architecture in the human brain
Tian, W., Zhou, J., Bartlett, A., Zeng, Q., Liu, H., Castanon, R. G., Kenworthy, M., Altshul, J., Valadon, C., Aldridge, A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf5357 · Cited by 154
Ballester, B., Medina-Rivera, A., Schmidt, D., Gonzàlez-Porta, M., Carlucci, M., Chen, X., Chessman, K., Faure, A. J., Funnell, A. P., Goncalves, A., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.02626 · Cited by 96
Seki, R., Li, C., Fang, Q., Hayashi, S., Egawa, S., Hu, J., Xu, L., Pan, H., Kondo, M., Sato, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14229 · Cited by 84
Microglia recapitulate a hematopoietic master regulator network in the aging human frontal cortex
Wehrspaun, C. C., Haerty, W., & Ponting, C. P. (2015) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.008 · Cited by 64
Yuan, X., Song, M., Devine, P., Bruneau, B. G., Scott, I. C., & Wilson, M. D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07451-z · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Heger, A., Webber, C., Goodson, M., Ponting, C. P., & Lunter, G.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-06-18
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2046-2048
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2108744961
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
